The Instigator
Kingofunky
Pro (for)
Winning
16 Points
The Contender
A-labama
Con (against)
Losing
6 Points

killing deformed children benefits society

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Kingofunky
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/1/2015 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 564 times Debate No: 83297
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

Kingofunky

Pro

killing these deformed monsters before they can grow up and have people attached to them must be done other wise the worlds future will be corrupted by deformation of perfectly healthy young children
A-labama

Con

The Spartans killed deformed children. The Spartans are all dead. Check, Your move.
Debate Round No. 1
Kingofunky

Pro

they may be dead but they are still considered one of the most god civilizations out there because thy purged the corrupt children from their ranks killing them so that the truly strong may survive. this should set a example for you that any child born with so much as a mole on their neck should be hung and burnt so that it cant infect the rest of society
A-labama

Con

First I would like to point out that Rome is the greatest Civilization out there. You know the difference between Sparta and Rome? Rome still exists. Rome didn't kill deformed children Rome's alive. The balls in your court your highness.

Sources:
1) My very large brain
Debate Round No. 2
Kingofunky

Pro

but did the Romans give care to these little monsters? no they simply ignored them, but people want to help and lend a hand to those in need. so given the fact that over their life time these things they leach off of tax payer money and cost their family's millions. just imagine that you have a child and its deformed, cant walk, cant talk, they are just a vegetable and you have to pay out of your pocket to keep this vegetable alive, when you kill just kill it early not get attached and still have money and time to make another child that might be useful to society
A-labama

Con

You are correct on one count. They are vegetables. You know what people use vegetables for eating. I'm not advocating eating them (but this is America). Do you know how hard it is to do slave labour. Not very. So we should not kill them, but use them to do our work to save our healthy children from a fate worse than death. Hunger death. Thank you and may the force be ever in you favour.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
KingofunkyA-labamaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This is a troll debate, so ny rfd isn't important. I voted fir con because I don't like monkeys
Vote Placed by Peepette 1 year ago
Peepette
KingofunkyA-labamaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wins points on spelling and grammar. Pros capitalization and punctuation is missing in many instances, also there are simple spelling errors. Conduct was equal. R3, Pro makes argument of cost verses usefulness, but does not extend point to societal benefit. Con does not address any of these points in his rebuttal. The fact that Pro made some attempt to make his point with no rebuttals from Con gives him the debate
Vote Placed by white2325 1 year ago
white2325
KingofunkyA-labamaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:61 
Reasons for voting decision: good job
Vote Placed by Evan_Of_Hearts 1 year ago
Evan_Of_Hearts
KingofunkyA-labamaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Whoa, I don't even know where to go with this...
Vote Placed by Reformist 1 year ago
Reformist
KingofunkyA-labamaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Its weird. But wow he made a good argument