The Instigator
manishagni2004
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
nerdyandnotsoproud
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points

lalu prasad yadav would be a good prime minister.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/25/2007 Category: Politics
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,827 times Debate No: 103
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

manishagni2004

Pro

as mr prasad is doing very well as rail minister he can.Laluji is the best-ever Railway Minister. He has presented yet another people-friendly budget with no hike in passenger fares and a slew of measures for improving the services and safety," Rabri Devi told reporters.

She said the record 20,000 crore profit was the result of untiring efforts of the railway fraternity under the leadership of Lalu Prasad.

Terming introduction of 32 trains, including five for Bihar as a commendable step, she said the greenfield electric locomotive manufacturing unit at Madhepura was a big gift for industry-starved Bihar.
nerdyandnotsoproud

Con

I believe Lalu Prasad Yadav would not be an acceptable candidate as prime minister. How can you say that he has done a good deed building railroads, knowing that these tracks have been used by terrorists to transport weapons and fire arms? I am not saying that he supports terrorism, but his ignorance and quite frankly, lack of incite, has left him unaware of the dangers associated with the development of the railroads.

A few years ago, Yadav went to Bangladesh to consult with their prime minister Khaled Zia, about foreign policies, especially those regarding tax on exportation trade. During his time in Dhaka, Yadav explicitly stated that Zia was a "terrorist" and "bigamist" because he supplied terrorist groups with oil and weaponry. However, due to an incompetent translator, it was proposed that the statement could have been slightly altered. Regardless of the actual declaration, Yadav undoubtedly profaned the leader of the foreign country.

There was also the rumor that Yadav had enslaved a Pakistani man. A twenty-four year old man claimed to be an actual slave of Yadav, kept in captivity for over eight years. Though these claims were dismissed as ludicrous and absurd, recent documents have shown that Yadav "adopted" a boy eight years prior to the rumor. This led to a search warrant, but Yadav rejected such idea and faced a private court, where he was exonerated from all charges. There have been questions as to how he was acquitted, but his defence attorney Drishank, had declined to comment on the issue. Some rumor that Yadav paid and bribed his way out.

Personally, I think it's absurd that Yadav would be even considered as candidate. India needs a leader who will facilitate success, not one that has a suspicious background.
Debate Round No. 1
manishagni2004

Pro

manishagni2004 forfeited this round.
nerdyandnotsoproud

Con

nerdyandnotsoproud forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
manishagni2004

Pro

The most imp attribute which should the prime minister possess is the leadership style so that he can walk with ruling and the party in the opposition. recently lalu anounced as a railway minister that railway is going to generate money through advertisement on te tickets..it is very creative step,which shows that he can make deficit budget as the profitable one ..and definitely become a very good prime minister..
nerdyandnotsoproud

Con

nerdyandnotsoproud forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by JBlake 9 years ago
JBlake
manishagni2004nerdyandnotsoproudTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Vote Placed by mrmatt505 9 years ago
mrmatt505
manishagni2004nerdyandnotsoproudTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by C-Mach 9 years ago
C-Mach
manishagni2004nerdyandnotsoproudTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03