Ladies and gentlemen, Pro would have you believe that LeBron (aka "LeGOAT") James can please his woman while Hillary Clinton is unable to do so. Pro would also have you believe that Bill Clinton's inability to remain loyal and honest to his wife is somehow indicative of her ability to please and serve both a nation and a lover of hers, in general.
I will hereby explain why not only is Pro's angle false but if anything it supports the Con view on this matter.
Hillary Clinton is married to, kindly put, a simple-minded barbarian whom not only was incapable of controlling his urges but regardless of his political savvy, was unable to keep a lid on his adultery. Hillary Clinton had the power to not only divorce him, which would have been both admired by the heavily feminist Democratic fan club but totally understood by any non-feminist who has any concept of what marriage and loyalty are. Instead of this impulsive, passionate move, Mrs. Clinton had the presence of mind to keep the marriage going. This displayed not only forgiveness and strength of character but pragmatically left her with all the power in the relationship from that point on. Someone so strategic and capable even at traumatic times of heartbreak makes a fantastic leader who knows how to be assertive without being aggressive and is kind enough to forgive people for mishaps but is very capable of letting them know they did wrong despite this forgiving nature. LeBron James, on the other hand, has never once shown strength of character nor forgiving nature in the slightest. He has displayed arrogance and greed his entire career, selling himself out to filthy rich corporations[http://www.forbes.com...] such as Nike (heavy user of sweatshops who only bothered slowing it down once finally caught [http://www.businessinsider.com...]), Dr. Dre Beats (as if the music you listen to makes you a better player), Dunkin' Donuts (great sports role model, really fantastic) and a variety of others.
Aside from character, LeBron James is also not capable of leading a nation. His role has always been as a member of a team run by a superior; his coach. The President is essentially a super-coach in relative terms and Mr. James has never once been in this role nor has he shown any capability of fulfilling it. There's already been a half-black president to the hype over race is pretty much done and dusted. Mrs. Clinton would be the first female president and gender is still a glass ceiling worth breaking in politics.
A horny husband is not proof of one's own sexual capabilities. Mrs. Clinton did, after all, successfully keep him loyal to her from that point on displaying the ability to learn from errors and fix her bootylicious ways. Learning from mistakes is something that Obama and George Bush never quite got their heads around and something USA really does need.
Reasons for voting decision: Con wins because they showed how Hillary had more experience in a leadership role and a government role, whereas Lebron James has none. This was the only argument made in this debate, because Pro continued on to use his rounds to type absolute nonsense.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.