The Instigator
number1letterA
Pro (for)
Losing
12 Points
The Contender
HeedMyFeed
Con (against)
Winning
30 Points

lepricons

Do you like this debate?NoYes-11
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/8/2009 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,866 times Debate No: 7298
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (10)
Votes (7)

 

number1letterA

Pro

lepricons do exist I found one in my back yard and I beat it with a shovel....riggghhhttt before sasquash saved it from its iminant doom. Do you believe me because that dude on the side of the magic class doesn't although he likes to copy me but I know he doing when I'm not looking. I've tryed using an other glass to see but the a-hole on the other side is doing the same thing.
HeedMyFeed

Con

I looked up lepricons in the dictionary and could not find it. It told me that I should perhaps search for leprechauns, but since that is not the topic at hand we shall not deal with it. So, this debate comes down to the fact that since we have no conception on what "lepricons" are, we cannot know they exist.

Plus, if you do not buy that argument, my opponent is on crack.

I would like to thank my opponent, and hope he poses a coherent response next round.
Debate Round No. 1
number1letterA

Pro

Well, I would like to state that you must have a vary good dictionary if it can redirect you to something different. Mine wont even give a definition to lepricon. anywase because I is tarribibles at forminging a coherints responses Iss try my bestest at giving my statements making senses.
I would also like state that just because you didn't see one leads me to believe that you are just jealous that you never saw it. I have reached said conclusion through my flawless deductive reasoning.
1) some people are jealous
2) I saw it and you did it
3) Because I saw it and you didn't you are jealous

"Plus, if you do not buy that argument, my opponent is on crack."
This sentance also makes little sense sense. Just because the audience does not by your arguement does not mean that I'm on crack. mabye they are the ones on crack; they are the ones who don't buy your argument.

I know, I know. you are outstandid by my impeccable statements of wisdom but what did you expect from Proffessor Kimm
HeedMyFeed

Con

My opponent tries as eloquently as possible to refute the point I made earlier. He says I am just jealous I did not see it. However, the problem is I do not know what "it" is. Even for things from myths, and fairy tales are still not found in the dictionary. Therefore, since we have no conception on what "it" is, I could not possibly be jealous. My opponent also tries saying that he is trying his best to give coherent responses. However, I suggest to him that he either use the "check your spelling feature", or go back to school.

Against my second point, my opponent completely misunderstands it. I just put it out there as another point that they could look at if they did not buy my first one. However, since my opponent is now accusing the audience of being on crack, you must clearly decipher that he is the one on crack.

Finally, my opponent refers to himself as "Proffessor Kimm", but the only way he could be a professor is if this was 2505 and the movie "Idiocracy".

I would like to thank my opponent for this entertaining round, and wish him luck in rehab.
Debate Round No. 2
number1letterA

Pro

Duh, "it" is lepricons. weren't you paying attention. That's the title of the debate. you do not know what "it" is and I'm telling you it is lepricons. Gosh!

I did not accuse any one of being on crack. I accused YOU of saying that the audience is on crack. Looks like someone is not paying attention.

It was 2505 yesterday for me. I went back in time to worn you about the lepricons but you are too busy debating the existence of a thing called "it".

I hope that Stephen King is on your side at least, despite the fact I basically won and Dean Koontz is on my side.
HeedMyFeed

Con

My opponent starts off by saying "it" is lepricons. However, if you look up "lepricons" in the dictionary you get nothing. It may suggest you to "leprechauns" but since the title of the debate is "lepricons", we are basically debate nothing. So my opponent is trying to convince you guys that "lepricons" exist, but since we do not know what these things are we can't possibly know what he is claiming to exist.

Next, my opponent says I accused the audience of being on crack. Actually, if you looked at the speech in my first round you can clearly decipher that I was accusing my opponent of being on crack. Since my opponent could not comprehend that argument or any of mine, you can clearly tell that he is on crack.

Since my opponent has failed to address any of my arguments, I urge a con vote.

I would also like to thank my opponent for using proper spelling and grammar, and not the ravings of a sugar high 5 year old like he did in his previous two rounds.
Debate Round No. 3
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by JP 7 years ago
JP
ya, I'm pretty sure pro was kidding. duh.
Posted by gamingmaster42 7 years ago
gamingmaster42
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘". . . . . . . . . .``~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ."-.,
. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ":,
. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:". . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . ."~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . "~,_. . . .."~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . ."=,_. . . ."-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~"; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . ."=-._. . .";,,./`. . /" . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . .."~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-"
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__
,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>--==``
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`thats right.
Posted by ChristianM 7 years ago
ChristianM
Dude. What are you smoking?
Fellas, I think we might have found the only thing that can kill Chuck Norris, a crappy debate.
Posted by gamingmaster42 7 years ago
gamingmaster42
wow.
Posted by I-am-a-panda 7 years ago
I-am-a-panda
I felt like shooting myself whilst reading this debate. Debate.org asked me if I liked this debate. I said no.
Posted by ChristianM 7 years ago
ChristianM
I generally voted for CON because you spelt lepricauns wrong like 43 times.
Posted by number1letterA 7 years ago
number1letterA
and what makes you think I don't. Huh?
Posted by guitarhero3lover 7 years ago
guitarhero3lover
you cant tell him to go back to school con, his profile says he has a post doctorial. :)
Posted by number1letterA 7 years ago
number1letterA
I am not a sugar high 5 year old Im this meny(hold up fingers)
Posted by leethal 7 years ago
leethal
Can I please buy some 'shrooms from you?
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by zach12 7 years ago
zach12
number1letterAHeedMyFeedTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by JP 7 years ago
JP
number1letterAHeedMyFeedTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:34 
Vote Placed by brendizzle29 7 years ago
brendizzle29
number1letterAHeedMyFeedTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by KRFournier 7 years ago
KRFournier
number1letterAHeedMyFeedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Vote Placed by animea 7 years ago
animea
number1letterAHeedMyFeedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by wpfairbanks 7 years ago
wpfairbanks
number1letterAHeedMyFeedTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:61 
Vote Placed by Alex 7 years ago
Alex
number1letterAHeedMyFeedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07