The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Repunter
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

life being nature, there is no, before life

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Repunter
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/12/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 5 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 148 times Debate No: 92663
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)

 

vi_spex

Pro

without everything there can be no source, so the source is everything
Repunter

Con

I accept your challenge.
The source is everything in extent. But to detach oneself is therefore null to the ideaology- Oh screw it, I know it's a spam debate but who cares- that in nature, it simply had to be existent. The logic here stating that the source has to have a source, and therefore creating an infinitude state of time.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

without everything there is no source of everything
Repunter

Con

But with everything there must be more source
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

more source then what
Repunter

Con

Than that of what is.
*mic drop*
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by vi_spex 5 months ago
vi_spex
it isnt circular if its true
Posted by skipsaweirdo 5 months ago
skipsaweirdo
I feel it needed to be posted twice because it takes 2 things to make a circle. Something to recognize it as a circle and something to draw it, print it, present it, create it, whatever you think it needs so it becomes the it.
Posted by skipsaweirdo 5 months ago
skipsaweirdo
Without everything there can be no source therefore the source is everything.
Circular reasoning 101
Posted by skipsaweirdo 5 months ago
skipsaweirdo
Without everything there can be no source therefore the source is everything.
Circular reasoning 101
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by parkerwil 5 months ago
parkerwil
vi_spexRepunterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Spam debate- conduct goes to con. Spelling and grammar goes to Con. Con won the argument. No sources given- no point.