longer curfews
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
DevonNetzley
| Started: | 11/22/2011 | Category: | Miscellaneous |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 617 times | Debate No: | 19421 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)
|
I believe that curfews should be longer for first time drivers. Who is with me?
i disagree |
![]() |
|
No man, no. the new drivers on the road have already proven themselves aboout how well they can drive by recieving their licences. how can you disagree with this i would've figured someone like you would like yo have stayed out later than a set period of time. say for saturday, it's already 10 and you need to go home but theirs this rockin party at 10:30 and you really want to go. but you can't because you have to go home. so do you or do you not agree???
I do not agree with this debate just because if your curfew is @ 10 and you want it to be @ 11 what could possibly happen within an hours time? something could happen in the middle of the day so what is the difference between 10 and 11? in Tennessee the curfew for new drivers under the age of 18 is 11. So what's the difference within an hour? this debate is not for "parties" it is about the curfew and what's the difference within a little while? |
![]() |
|
the difference is not just an hour. it involves the ability to have more freedom. how could you not agree with more freedom? that is just not right.
Freedom doesn't matter, in the case that your debate accured you stated "I believe that curfews should be longer for first time drivers." but now your talking about freedom??? If you are going to start talking about "freedom" then start a debate about freedom instead of changing the subject from the safety of teen drivers to the freedom of young drivers. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by DevonNetzley 1 year ago

Report this Comment
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by phantom 1 year ago
| DevonNetzley | BoMcLemore | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Horrible debate but pros arguments were slightly more relevant.
Vote Placed by Mr.Infidel 1 year ago
| DevonNetzley | BoMcLemore | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Terrible debate from both sides. Both showed terrible conduct, grammar, arguments; and no sources. TIED








