The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Logiq
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

love and hate

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Logiq
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/18/2017 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,125 times Debate No: 100050
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (44)
Votes (3)

 

vi_spex

Pro

returning at positive energy of self is love for myself, is love for everyone else, and returning at positive energy of something or some one else is hate for everyone else and myself

love=positive emotion+returning at energy
hate=returning at energy
Logiq

Con

The proposed argument is as follows:

Primarily having positive energy for oneself is love for oneself and others
Primarily having positive energy for others is hate for oneself and for others
Therefore, depending on your preference, positive energy can be both love and hate.

This is a logical fallacy as something cannot be both itself and its opposite at the same time.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

no not having, getting positive energy from self.. rather then getting it from cigarettes for eksample

being myself, is love for myself and everyone else.. is an easier way to say it

hate is negative to contrast with positive

everyone is 1, or everyone are themselves
Logiq

Con

Hello, thanks for the response.

First, I have a question:

If being yourself is positive for yourself and others
And if you were naturally a negative person
Would being negative be positive for yourself and others?

Your updated argument is as follows:

Primarily getting positive energy from oneself is love for oneself and others
Primarily getting positive energy from other things is hate for oneself and for others
Therefore, depending on where you get it, positive energy can be both love and hate.

This is still a fallacy like the first for the same reasons.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

joy is the only true positive emotion.. self is true
Logiq

Con

Thanks for debating.

Shaun.
Debate Round No. 3
44 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
no if involved
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
its not..
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
immorality=oppinion truth
Posted by TheUnexaminedLife 1 year ago
TheUnexaminedLife
What if right now I'm dreaming and all my past memories are confabulated/made-up? Would they still both be true and truth?
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
truth can only be in the past

what do you need right now?
is a question
Posted by TheUnexaminedLife 1 year ago
TheUnexaminedLife
What I meant was 'what I need right now'=true. Aside from the time, what is the difference between what is true and truth?
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
i dont understand your question
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
future=false
now=true
past=truth
Posted by TheUnexaminedLife 1 year ago
TheUnexaminedLife
Just to simplify things, are you saying that what is true is only my necessary means of survival in this instance of consciousness?
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
true is the opposite of false and truth, and false is the opposite of truth.. like now future and past
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by paintballvet18 1 year ago
paintballvet18
vi_spexLogiqTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Eksample. For the record, who was supposed to debate what?
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 1 year ago
9spaceking
vi_spexLogiqTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: eksample
Vote Placed by madness 1 year ago
madness
vi_spexLogiqTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: The debate was so very boring and without any substance. Vi_spex spelt example as, "eksample" therefore I'm giving away a point. Can't believe I actually read this debate.