macroevolution has effectively stopped in humans
Debate Rounds (3)
we won't be developing into another species in any immediate sense, or getting significantly altered due to evolution.
we may evolve in space, but this is far off and not the current time period being discussed.
remember, evolution is where the weak die and the only those that live to copulate further their genes. changes in specific animals don't cause evolution... eg, you can't cut your thumb off and get your kids thumbless.
there will be spurts as those who are superior will tend to get together etc... but on balance, the weak will dilute the gene pool. we will never branch off into another species or become superior in our own, if we don't have the weaker among us die off.
and in every other sense that we might be considered 'evolving' it is minor.
Case 1. How Do We Know For Sure?
Has anything been clearly defined in scientific law stating that humans are finished with our evolutionary process? I have evidence we're still evolving. This leads me to my second point.
Case 2. We're still evolving
Humans are still evolving. For instance, women who are severely underweight could mother children in the past. However, they are now unable to mother children if their weight is too low. (1)
This proves that humans are still evolving. If they are still evolving, it will lead to a large scale change.
Sorry for this being so short. This is really all that needed to be put though.
con doesn't understand evolution. a mother who changes her body and ability to have kids does not mean evolution. again, evolution is where species change via certain members dying off and only the resultant are left for changes.
I would like to raise a question to Pro. If evolution means the previous species have to die, how come monkeys and apes are still alive?
I would like to introduce my own definition of evolution.
Evolution: change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift. (1)
Therefore, my research study proves evolution is still taking place in humans. Therefore, we have solid evidence that macroevolution has not stopped either.
Cooldudebro forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by TheJuniorVarsityNovice 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||3|
Reasons for voting decision: condo for ff. arguments because dairygirl litterally put up no case defense besides a perpetual 'nuh uh'. dairygirl was unable to disprove con's source which demonstrated microevolution in pregnant women.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.