The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ThinkBig
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

maybe obama is god

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
ThinkBig
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/10/2016 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 485 times Debate No: 92594
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (10)
Votes (4)

 

vi_spex

Pro

therfore any order he gives is justified..
ThinkBig

Con

The burden of proof is on pro to show that there is a possibility that Obama is God. He has not offered up any evidence.

God is defined as an omnipotent, omnipresent, and transcendent being. Obama is none of those.

Furthermore, God is defined as being sinless and perfect. Obama, while a great President, is far from perfect and has made mistakes.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

obama hides his power for a reason

gods word is truth whatever god may say, god remains good.

god has no need to demonstrate his power to rule humans
ThinkBig

Con

Not everything Obama has said is true. For example, Obama has had 70 statements declared to be false by Politifact and 9 statements to be pants on fire false.

One of the biggest examples is when Obama said, "If you like your healthcare, or your doctor, you can keep it." This was shown to be false.

Resolution negated. Obama is not God.

http://www.politifact.com...
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

gods word is the truth
ThinkBig

Con

And that is why Obama is not God.

Vote con.
Debate Round No. 3
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
religion.
Posted by parkerwil 1 year ago
parkerwil
vi_spex No my friend, he destroyed you..
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
obviusly i destroyed this guy is all im saying..
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
how could you possibly lie if you can turn back time and delete peoples memories
Posted by fire_wings 1 year ago
fire_wings
I don't understand what you are saying vi_spex.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
this is simple to understand for any one who ever won a debate
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
having*
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
unlimited power makes no room for lies
Posted by fire_wings 1 year ago
fire_wings
From the Voter's Team.
Posted by fire_wings 1 year ago
fire_wings
The Burden of Proof is in Pro. If Pro's arguments stand, he wins. Pro's argument is that God's orders are justified, and he is always saying truth, and Obama does also. Con rebuts this argument by saying that not all of Obama's statements were true, some false, and gave two sources. I will not give sources to Con, though, because there is no need to. All of Pro's arguments are refuted by Con, therefore Con wins in arguments point. Pro had a few spelling errors, but does not give any impact to the debate itself. I vote Con.

Feedback: This was a horrible debate, with many bare assertions, and for a troll debate though, Con argued excellently by the short characters. He provided sources, and refuted Con's bad arguments, and I myself had hard to refute vi_spex arguments, because they are too horrible. But because of Pro's horrible performance, the debate was a horrible debate. I know that Pro will never improve, so I wouldn't give any feedback to him, because it is a waste of my time. Vote Con/
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by 42lifeuniverseverything 1 year ago
42lifeuniverseverything
vi_spexThinkBigTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct is equal because both sides did debate. Con wins grammar because Pro did not have a grammatical structure in round 1. Con wins arguments for 3 reasons. 1) Con defined God, which Pro should have done having the BOP. 2) Pro agreed to the definition of God, making all arguments based off of it correct. 3) Obama being proven to lie shows Obama is not God. Con wins arguments. Con also wins sources because Con provided a credible source in the form of Politifact. I VOTE CON.
Vote Placed by Udel 1 year ago
Udel
vi_spexThinkBigTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro has the burden of proof, and must explain how obama fits any definition of God (not just the one definition outlined by Con). Pro says obama hides his power, and God has no reason to demonstrate his power, but did not offer an alternative definition of God. Con explained how obama lies and therefore is not 100% truth like God is. Pro says "God's word is the truth" which just affirms Con's argument.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 1 year ago
Ragnar
vi_spexThinkBigTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: BoP. Pro asseted circular reasoning, con pointed out the lack of proof, to which pro inferred that lack of proof is proof. A reason why might be carryable, but nothing was given for weight...
Vote Placed by fire_wings 1 year ago
fire_wings
vi_spexThinkBigTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: RFD in comments, from the Voter's Team.