The Instigator
iAnonymous
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points
The Contender
phantom
Con (against)
Winning
27 Points

me grammar suck

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
phantom
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/19/2012 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 615 times Debate No: 22158
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (6)

 

iAnonymous

Pro

me grammar suck

me opponent argue me grammar good

me argue me grammar no good

luck good you my friend
phantom

Con

To win this debate I have to demonstrate that pros grammar does not suck.

If we look at his other debates we will find that he has fine grammar.

http://www.debate.org...

In this debate pro uses commas, capitalization and periods. His grammar does not suck.


Now my case is very believable. It is obvious pro has purposfully had bad grammar in this debate. Just look at the title. We cannot go by this debate on whether pro has good grammar.

Debate Round No. 1
iAnonymous

Pro

me grammar WAS good but me grammar suck NOW

it good in past but it suck now
phantom

Con

My opponent has so far failed to meet his BoP.


His arguments are based solely on trust. Should we trust my opponents word that his grammar somehow magically lessened drastically in a matter of minutes? Or do we accept the obvious fact that pro is using horrible grammar for the sole reason that this debate is about his grammar. So far he has been very unconvincing, thus I contend that we have very little reason to accept pros word based on trust rather than my logical arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
iAnonymous

Pro

it true because me brain have problem

my brain bad

me grammar literally is suck

please vote me because me grammar suck

it story true

i sad now me grammar suck :(
phantom

Con

To conclude we still have little reason to accept pros word which is solely based on trust. Pro has not given suffecient reason as to why we should believe him, thus faild to meet his BOP. The evidence is conclusive. In other debates pro has good grammar. In this debate he has bad grammar. There are no good reasons to believe his grammar has agresively decreased in a matter of minutes, due to a brain disorder. There is not even any evidence such a brain problem exists, let alone that pro has it.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Zaradi 2 years ago
Zaradi
You know what else took 20 minutes?
*suggestive wink*

.....no! Not that you pedophile! Get away from me!
Posted by funkymuppetsV2 2 years ago
funkymuppetsV2
you know what else took 20 minutes?
*suggestive wink*

a quick game of chess
Posted by phantom 2 years ago
phantom
20 minute debate
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 2 years ago
1dustpelt
iAnonymousphantomTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con proved that Pro's grammar in other debates does not "suck".
Vote Placed by Zaradi 2 years ago
Zaradi
iAnonymousphantomTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: I give S/G to Pro for the lulz, but con had a clear win here.
Vote Placed by imabench 2 years ago
imabench
iAnonymousphantomTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: con proved that pro's grammar is fine by referencing other debates. arguments to the con, sources to the con, conduct to the con since pro lied about his grammar basically. Also, pro's grammar in this debate sucked
Vote Placed by Travniki 2 years ago
Travniki
iAnonymousphantomTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: Con played the debate by his terms and won it. He couldn't match Pros spelling and Grammar however..
Vote Placed by THEBOMB 2 years ago
THEBOMB
iAnonymousphantomTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: lol another quicky debate...but, Pro never proved his grammar always sucks....Pros grammar did not in the past and they were just faking it for this debate.
Vote Placed by TheDiabolicDebater 2 years ago
TheDiabolicDebater
iAnonymousphantomTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pros grammar is fine in other debates. I find it ironic that his grammar only sucks in this debate.