The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
KendasKerman
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

morality=reason+intent

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/8/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 956 times Debate No: 77409
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (53)
Votes (0)

 

vi_spex

Pro

healthy mushroom=not immoral to give to my kid
deadly poisonous mushroom=immoral to give to my kid
"default setting"

it is wrong for me to punch you, unless its right, morality explained

is it wrong to reason about rape?
KendasKerman

Con

In order to argue about this, we must first define morality. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, morality is defined as

"Some codes of conduct put forward by a society."

This essentially shows that morality is nothing but a set of codes, however, it also states that morality is also put forward by a SOCIETY, which is defined as so:

"The aggregate of people living together in a more or less ordered community."

Using this, we can see that it is impossible to put a specific equation on such a broad subject such as morality, when it is so broad that nearly every community in the world will have a different one. To one society, their morals may be based upon honorable death in an arena for a simple crime such as stealing,while another may believe that you have a right to take whatever you wish. Henceforth, it is impossible to accurately depict morality in a function as is attempted here.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

it states what it is it dosnt show anything.

is it wrong to reason about rape?
KendasKerman

Con

Please, when arguing, I would think that you should be more specific with subject you are defining. What do you mean by "It states what it is it dosnt show anything." What doesn't show anything? What do you mean by "is it wrong to reason with rape?"

I am going to assume your question is asking if rape is wrong. Of course rape is wrong. Non-consensual sex takes away from the base human right of a "pursuit of happiness". Is that even a question?
Debate Round No. 2
KendasKerman

Con

Yes, my icon is a snake, a cobra in fact. Now, present your arguement.
Debate Round No. 3
vi_spex

Pro

present your counter
KendasKerman

Con

Er... what exactly IS your arguement? You never made a clear one.
Debate Round No. 4
vi_spex

Pro

i havnt seen a con
KendasKerman

Con

You must be genuinely stupid, or a troll. For my and your sake, I hope it is the latter, as I refuse to believe that there is anyone this screwed up in the head.
Debate Round No. 5
53 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by KendasKerman 1 year ago
KendasKerman
Cause and effect is logic, too bad you don't have any.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
give me an example of why cause and effect is not logic
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
show me where i am wrong, and i accept
Posted by lol101 1 year ago
lol101
Find out
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
what is the subject
Posted by lol101 1 year ago
lol101
Accept my debate
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
matter can at best transform
Posted by lol101 1 year ago
lol101
And no. It isn't true. Thoughts are subjective, and cannot destroy something objective like poison.
Posted by lol101 1 year ago
lol101
You make assertions as well... hypocrite. Do I really need to use evidence and supporting reasoning if you won't?

Accept my debate.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
is it true that you can change the effects of eating a poisonous mushroom with your thoughts?
No votes have been placed for this debate.