balance is a higher level then truth, an ugly rich man is likely to get a female, and so dosnt have to be jealous of others or rape females
The topic of this entry is not"at least directly"moral theory; rather, it is the definition of morality. Moral theories are large and complex things; definitions are not. The question of the definition of morality is the question of identifying the target of moral theorizing. Identifying this target enables us to see different moral theories as attempting to capture the very same thing. In this way, the distinction between a definition of morality and a moral theory parallels the distinction
There does not seem to be much reason to think that a single definition of morality will be applicable to all moral discussions. One reason for this is that "morality" seems to be used in two distinct broad senses: a descriptive sense and a normative sense. More particularly, the term "morality" can be used either
1.Descriptively to refer to certain codes of conduct put forward by a society or a group (such as a religion), or accepted by an individual for her own behaviour
2. Normatively to refer to a code of conduct that, given specified conditions, would be put forward by all rational persons.
Which of these two senses of "morality" a theorist is using plays a crucial, although sometimes unacknowledged, role in the development of an ethical theory. If one uses "morality" in its descriptive sense, and therefore uses it to refer to codes of conduct actually put forward by distinct groups or societies, one will almost certainly deny that there is a universal morality that applies to all human beings. Be it a primitive instinct or a instinct one makes entirely on their own behalf, morals differs between person, so I ask you to rephrase what you meant by "truth".
survival is necessary
and im arguing that, survival truth is applicable in all cases
lies are complicated by seperation
truth is, memory, knowledge, personal experience.. and beliefs are lies
religion is immorality to contrast, as truth is knowledge
knowledge is opposite of belief, knowledge is truth, truth is unchanging, like math dosnt change
truth can only be in the past
to say there is a difference to truth is like saying there is a difference to math.. where as 1+1 dosnt equal 2..but this is not the case on the standard level use of math..
truth is unchanging, if there were multiple truths then i might as well have gotten into this seat from my car as by walking by the same time.. which cant be the case, i have 1 body