The Instigator
dairygirl4u2c
Pro (for)
Tied
1 Points
The Contender
Max.Wallace
Con (against)
Tied
1 Points

most states should not yet legalize pot

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/2/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 656 times Debate No: 62562
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (11)
Votes (1)

 

dairygirl4u2c

Pro

pot can cause problems such as mental health issues. they've done studies on this. this just causes disability and welfare spending to increase a lot more. most states should be monitoring colorado and washington to see how much the bad effects arise in those states.
Max.Wallace

Con

Pot is a plant, given by the earth, so is coffee.

Tax coffee and pot the same, and watch the revolution!!!!!!!

Legalize it the same way, all plants that humans utilize should be taxed say the tyrants.
Debate Round No. 1
dairygirl4u2c

Pro

con speaks gibberish. he says tax it, then says only tyrants say tax it. and he doesn't negate the problems i presented that it causes.
Max.Wallace

Con

The problems it causes, are your perception of reality. Have you considered what problems it alleviates? HAVE YOU?!!!!!!!!

Many more are happy for it then are cursed by it. That is plain fact, just spend your big subsidized farm bucks and petition the users equally. Surely that will never happen as you have made up your mind.

Every tax dollar spent to fund a new "miracle cure"/ "snake oil"/ the latest and greatest substitute for nature, comes with a little folder of fine print too small for anyone older then 30 to read wwithout a magnifying glass describing the side effects. Meanwhile, Wall Street and the Pharmaceutical Devils laugh all the way to the bank. That is acceptable?

NO. Period. As your leader would say.

LOL!
Debate Round No. 2
dairygirl4u2c

Pro

con gives a bunch of arguments that go all over the place. i dont evenknow where and how i'd begin to reign in that type of speak.
Max.Wallace

Con

broad speak it is called, you have the ability, just not the will, YET.
Debate Round No. 3
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
Tax neither is letting freedom ring. May your eardrums split from the ringing Sir Taxalot!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
Pot and coffee, both addictive. Legalize one for the taxation, and let the other slide? What a scum sucking vampire thinks.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
The self proclaimed geniuses of morals have spoken.
Posted by flash7221 2 years ago
flash7221
thought this might have been a decent debate, guess not
Posted by flash7221 2 years ago
flash7221
okay, they have done studies, where is the proof? Charts? Graphs? sources?
Posted by Pfalcon1318 2 years ago
Pfalcon1318
At Gods_Servant, actually, the way things work on here is that BoP rests with PRO to demonstrate the resolution true, unless it is otherwise stated.

If you just want to bring in data to make her job harder, that's great. I'm just letting you know that, so that it doesn't screw you over when you get into a debate down the road.
Posted by Pfalcon1318 2 years ago
Pfalcon1318
At Gods_Servant, actually, the way things work on here is that BoP rests with PRO to demonstrate the resolution true, unless it is otherwise stated.

If you just want to bring in data to make her job harder, that's great. I'm just letting you know that, so that it doesn't screw you over when you get into a debate down the road.
Posted by Gods_Servant 2 years ago
Gods_Servant
id accept but i just joined the other day and i have a huge amount of data to support my claims too
Posted by n7 2 years ago
n7
Actually I shouldn't. I may or may not have the time.
Posted by n7 2 years ago
n7
I would accept if you were to lower the criteria.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by RevL8ion 2 years ago
RevL8ion
dairygirl4u2cMax.WallaceTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:11 
Reasons for voting decision: Max.Wallace has ruined another honest debate yet again. Both sides have made pitiful excuses of arguments. The only reason Pro won was because of better conduct, but spelling goes to Con.