movie versus debate opponent choses
Debate Rounds (4)
1. The movies have to be of similar or equal quality.
2. As con gets to pick the two films I get to pick which of the two I think is better.
3. This debate will obviously include some form of opinion, so the argument that since it's an opinion it shouldn't be considered a point is banned from this debate.
4.seeing as last time was a flop because of me not seeing the films they have to have been releases any time from 1980 to 2015, and must have been nominated for an oscar or golden globe.
Film #1: Francis Ford Coppola's "Apocalypse Now"
Film #2: Stanley Kubrick's "Full Metal Jacket"
Film #1's release date is 1 yr shy of 1980 but this was oked by Pro in PM.
I would first like to thank my opponent for picking two great movies it should be a great debate.
I choose the movie full metal jacket as the film I will debate is better.
Some of my points include.
1. It is in my opinion more fun to watch
2. It is easier to watch
3 the acting is better
4 one performance in particular is extremely iconic
5. Apocalypse now is in my opinion an extreme bore to watch in one session
6 Kubrick masterpiece
Although they have both become epic war movies, I will demonstrate that "Apocalypse Now" (denoted AN) is clearly a better movie than "Full Metal Jacket" (denoted FMJ) by providing the following evidence in Round 3:
1. AN received better reviews from movie critics.
2. AN had better sound, cinematography and better acting.
3. Unlike other Vietnam movies, AN uses surrealistic cinematic sequences so that the viewer FEELS rather than sees the chaos and horrors of war.
djones16 forfeited this round.
"Full Metal Jacket" (FMJ).
To consider which movie is better, we must first provide our method of evaluation. What makes a movie good to watch? My premise is that movies can be best compared in the following areas:
These are the main merit categories in which movies are judged by the film industries" two main award ceremonies honoring cinematic achievements. 
In addition to this, I believe we can add a special merit category since we are comparing two Vietnam War movies: Capturing the Essence of the Vietnam War. This is important because film is one of our culture"s great methods of storytelling and it is crucial to express not only the facts and history of events but the atmosphere and emotions.
Of these categories, AN will be shown to be superior in four with a undecided verdict in the fifth.
I don"t believe there is a clear victory for either movie in terms of screenplay. Both were very well written and received nominations from the Academy Awards ceremony in their respective years.
AN was by far superior than FMJ when it came to sound and score. All-in-all, AN was nominated for (5) major awards for sound. Of these (5), the movie won an Academy Award for best sound and a Golden Globe for best original score.  In comparison, FMJ only received a nomination for a BAFTA award for best sound. 
An example of great movie sound came in the Ride of the Valkyries scene when the helicopter raid destroys a peaceful town. This scene was chosen as the most memorable movie scene ever by Empire Magazine  The sound highlights the disparity between the chaos of the incoming war party and the peace of the quiet village.
AN was also superior with respect to acting. All-in-all, AN was nominated for (7) major awards for acting including an Academy Award. Frederic Forrest won a National Society of Film Critics Award for his role as Jay "Chef" Hicks. Robert Duvall won an American Movie Award, a British Film Academy Award, and a Golden Globe for his role as Lieutenant Colonel William Kilgore. His character uttered the 12th highest rated movie quotes according to the American Film Institute with the words, "I love the smell of napalm in the morning".  His emptiness is startling. A surfing fanatic, he attacks only to liberate a beach said to have great waves. "Charlie don't surf". In comparison, FMJ received only one nomination, in which R. Lee Ermey managed to win a best supporting actor award by the Boston Society of Film Critics Awards. While FMJ offered very few, if any, major actors. AN was filled with some of acting"s greats, including the following:
-and yes R. Lee Ermey was in this film ALSO
AN was also superior in the category of cinematography. All-in-all, AN was nominated for (2) major awards. Of these nominations, AN went on to win an Academy Award for cinematography. In comparison, FMJ did not receive any nominations for it's cinematography.
One great cinematography choice was the pulsing light from flares in the Do Lung Bridge scene. Adding to the sense of chaos and the unknown.
The movie's use of low-ley lighting is amazing and adds to the overall feeling and symbolism of the movie. Marlon's character appears and his monologue begins. At first he is obscured completely in darkness then only the left side of his face becomes partially visible. His character having embraced the horrors of war he has become mad, he was at home in the darkness and almost completely consumed by it.
Essence of the Vietnam War
It is important that a Vietnam War movie portray the spirit and the atmosphere of the Vietnam War. Although FMJ is considered one of the most historically accurate Vietnam War films , arguably no film exposes the raw emotions of that war greater than AN. This was the chief ambition of director Francis Ford Coppola, who once remarked, "My film is not about Vietnam, it is Vietnam." Did he accomplish his objective? To quote the great movie critic Robert Ebert, "Other important films such as "Platoon," "The Deer Hunter," "Full Metal Jacket" and "Casualties of War" take their own approaches to Vietnam." "But "Apocalypse Now" is the best Vietnam film, one of the greatest of all films, because it pushes beyond the others, into the dark places of the soul. It is not about war so much as about how war reveals truths we would be happy never to discover." 
As a Total Picture
In entirety, however, a movie needs not only to have great sound, superb acting, and awe inspiring cinematography. All these talents have to come together perfectly; each augmenting the other. AN was nominated for an Acadamy Award for best picture, considered the most important Academy Award . In addition, the film was nominated for a British Academy Film Award, a Cesar Award, and a Golden Globe for best picture or film.  It received the Palme d"Or, the highest prize awarded at the Cannes Film Festival. In comparison, FMJ only received a nomination for best foreign film from the Japanese Academy.
As a picture, AN was highly critically acclaimed. As Robert Ebert stated, "One of the greatest". Here is a full comparison:
American Film Institute"s Top 100 Movies: AN #28, FMJ no votes 
Rotten Tomatoes: AN 98%, FMJ 94% 
IMBD: AN #47, FMJ #86 
"Apocalypse Now" has been heralded as one of the greatest films by film critics and academies alike. It"s been placed ahead of "Full Metal Jacket" in every major category and by every major film critic. "Full Metal Jacket" is a great movie, and it deserves to be on every "must see" list. However, it doesn"t immerse your sensory perception with the disorder and despair, chaos and craziness of the Vietnam War like "Apocalypse Now". It blends both light and sound together for a picture that pushes us "into the dark places of [our] soul".
djones16 forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||6|
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.