The Instigator
DEEEBSAA
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Zarroette
Con (against)
Winning
19 Points

mun is the best

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Zarroette
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/5/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 642 times Debate No: 67830
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

DEEEBSAA

Pro

It is better.
Zarroette

Con

I thank DEEEBESAA for the opportunity to debate this topic.

Since my opponent is affirming the resolution, my opponent needs to make arguments to fulfil this burden of proof. In the event that my opponent's arguments are beaten or are shown to be equal to mine, I will win this debate due to my opponent not meeting his/her burden of proof.

Keep in mind that no definitions have been specified.

With that said, I await my opponent's opening round arguments.
Debate Round No. 1
DEEEBSAA

Pro

DEEEBSAA forfeited this round.
Zarroette

Con

My opponent's resolution involves a debate on whether "mun is the best". In order to prove that mun is the best, my opponent needs to show that mun is the best in absolutely everything in ever possible way, as there were no parameters to being the best. In light of this, I only need to show one instance of mun not being the best in order to win this debate.


Affirmative Case


A1: Sir Donald Bradman was the best batsman of all time


Sir Donald Bradman has a test average of 99.94, which is by far the best in all of world cricket [1]. Meanwhile, "mun" has yet to play test cricket, and therefore has no average. 99.94>0.



Reference

[1] http://www.espncricinfo.com...;
Debate Round No. 2
DEEEBSAA

Pro

DEEEBSAA forfeited this round.
Zarroette

Con

The link I gave didn't work, so here it is again:

http://www.espncricinfo.com...


Please extend.
Debate Round No. 3
DEEEBSAA

Pro

DEEEBSAA forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
DEEEBSAA

Pro

DEEEBSAA forfeited this round.
Zarroette

Con

Please vote for me =)
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
DEEEBSAAZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Con. Pro forfeited nearly every round in this debate. S&G - Tie. Both had adequate spelling and grammar where applicable. Arguments - Con. Pro failed to present any arguments whatsoever to affirm their position. Since Con was left standing unchallenged, Con wins arguments. Sources - Con. Pro failed to utilize sources in this debate whereas Con did. This is a clear win for Con.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
DEEEBSAAZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
DEEEBSAAZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF and no contest.
Vote Placed by donald.keller 2 years ago
donald.keller
DEEEBSAAZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: You know what I need? Apple pie... I LOVE apple pie.