The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
Conservatism
Con (against)
Losing
2 Points

my oppinion is the best

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
vi_spex
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/12/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 10 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 530 times Debate No: 93648
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (25)
Votes (2)

 

vi_spex

Pro

you have dragon on you head

hehe i won.. voters love meh its my oppion, and my oppinion is voters can only vote for me

-your brain

hard facts prove every single point i have made here, this person actually believes votes prove something.. this is no lie, its the case..
Conservatism

Con

Are you mentally stable?
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

vote..

am i wrong?
Debate Round No. 2
25 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by whiteflame 10 months ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: migmag// Mod action: Removed<

7 points to Pro. Reasons for voting decision: "i completely agree with everything vi-spex had to say,

[*Reason for removal*] Not an RFD.
************************************************************************
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
stay owned clown
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
mission success.. enemy retardation revealed to the point of silent crying in the shadows
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
and not an argument in existence to the contrary.. troll absolutly detected
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
you are the best proof or demonstration for your own retarded position.. you own it
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
do not speak to your king unless he tells you to
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
what is this troll saying
Posted by Conservatism 10 months ago
Conservatism
The RFD should be public now.
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
and i dont give a fuckk about grammer imbeciles
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
unbrearable idiocy, ddo.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by RonaldTrumpkin 10 months ago
RonaldTrumpkin
vi_spexConservatismTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: As there was no debate to speak of I could only grade on S/G. vi_spex has a habit of not properly punctuating and capitalizing his sentences, and that trend continues here. Various spelling mistakes (oppion, oppinion) in addition give these points to CON. I will not grade for conduct as I have interpreted CON's remark in round 1 as a question instead of an insult. He did not attack PRO's character as it may seem.
Vote Placed by evanjfarrar 10 months ago
evanjfarrar
vi_spexConservatismTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro provided an actual argument, and Con responded with an insult. Although Pro's argument is not convincing, Con does not present anything. Pro's arguments contained considerable grammatical errors that hindered understanding, but luckily, this wasn't necessary (but the point is granted regardless).