The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
james14
Con (against)
Winning
14 Points

need for confirmation is suicide

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
james14
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/9/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 721 times Debate No: 66671
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (12)
Votes (3)

 

james14

Con

Why does vi_spex keep this up? Senseless debates that mean nothing and carry no coherency whatsoever.

Confirmation: "the action of confirming something or the state of being confirmed." (google dictionary)
Need: "circumstances in which something is necessary, or that require some course of action; necessity."
Suicide: Obviously killing yourself.

So, stringing these words together we get:

Circumstances in which the action of confirming something or the state of being confirmed is necessary are suicide.

Which doesn't really make sense. So if we need to confirm something we are killing ourselves? This doesn't make sense, is not logical, and fails. This is a pointless debate that I probably shouldn't have wasted my time on. Pro's position is obviously false.

Pro says, "yes."

I say "no." His argument is therefore refuted and I win, especially since I actually supplied some reasons.
Debate Round No. 1
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
I can kill you with just few words and a smile
Posted by gherkin 2 years ago
gherkin
And don't even try to correct the word sense in my previous comment. You've done it before and I know you know what I mean. Your just trying to sound right.
Posted by gherkin 2 years ago
gherkin
Vi_spex your not god stop acting like your cool. All of your arguements dont make any sense, they dont carry any weight. Honestly their easy to win, or it makes so little sense that you cant even respond to it. Just stop your annoying the people on this website.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
I do this because im god
Posted by notyourbusiness 2 years ago
notyourbusiness
His brain I mean
Posted by notyourbusiness 2 years ago
notyourbusiness
I'd like to investigate the inner channels of vi_spex. It is currently unclear as to whether this account is a vent for his stress or simply what he takes as fun.
Posted by gomergcc 2 years ago
gomergcc
what is brilliant is if you win a debate against Vi_spex your Elo Ranking goes down. Mine went from 2500 to 2100 for winning
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
god is not unicorns?
Posted by cheyennebodie 2 years ago
cheyennebodie
I think he needs an adjustment in his meds.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
if unicorns cant exist, god cant exist, so god is unicorns
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by gomergcc 2 years ago
gomergcc
vi_spexjames14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro only said one word
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
vi_spexjames14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con said something.
Vote Placed by Envisage 2 years ago
Envisage
vi_spexjames14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Does this even need an RFD? Since this RFD is already longer than Pro's title + argument.