The Instigator
John_Este
Pro (for)
Losing
8 Points
The Contender
thett3
Con (against)
Winning
17 Points

obama should be reelect

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
thett3
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/20/2012 Category: Health
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,254 times Debate No: 21282
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (10)
Votes (5)

 

John_Este

Pro

cmon Obama kill 3 terrolist he get reelect.
thett3

Con

Thanks Pro. I'll assume that round one is for acceptance.
Debate Round No. 1
John_Este

Pro

John_Este forfeited this round.
thett3

Con

0bama shuldnt b reject bc he b blck and blck ppl r bad
Debate Round No. 2
John_Este

Pro

Obama kill 3 terrolists and he awesome why he not get relected?
thett3

Con

As a user in the comments pointed out, Obama didn't kill terrorists, soldiers did. My Opponent has given you no reason to support Obamas re-election, and thus has failed to meet his burden of proof. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by flam21 2 years ago
flam21
well.....i believe everyone who reads this debate got less intelligent...
Posted by cameronl35 2 years ago
cameronl35
Is this what happens when I leave DDO for a few weeks..thett I am disappointed
Posted by 1dustpelt 2 years ago
1dustpelt
Hey! I also wish to remind you that the word "Nerd" is
1. A Registered Trademark of Wonka Inc.

I am not a Nerd because I am not a purple candy.
Posted by John_Este 2 years ago
John_Este
Hey I'm not the one who studies history all day! NERD!
Posted by 1dustpelt 2 years ago
1dustpelt
yes lol he is stupid.
Posted by thett3 2 years ago
thett3
You know him?
Posted by 1dustpelt 2 years ago
1dustpelt
lol wtf. Leave it to John to create such a stupid debate. I am going to ask him right now.
Posted by Doulos1202 2 years ago
Doulos1202
Soldiers killed terrorists* not Obama
Posted by FourTrouble 2 years ago
FourTrouble
yes... LMAO
Posted by 16kadams 2 years ago
16kadams
lol
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by imabench 2 years ago
imabench
John_Estethett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to meet his BOP, on a second thought both had bad grammar, spelling is tied
Vote Placed by BlackVoid 2 years ago
BlackVoid
John_Estethett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Counter
Vote Placed by PlanetTutTutTurtle 2 years ago
PlanetTutTutTurtle
John_Estethett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Bad debate. I give Pro all points because Con is racist in his argument: 0bama shuldnt b reject bc he b blck and blck ppl r bad. Really?
Vote Placed by Xerge 2 years ago
Xerge
John_Estethett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con rebutted Pro's only argument which caused him not to meet the burden of proof.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 2 years ago
1dustpelt
John_Estethett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: This is obvious. Conduct to Con because of forfeit. Spelling tied because Con also used bad grammar in round two. Neither had sources. Arguments to Con because of succesfully rebutted in round 3. John, your an idiot.