Since it is only science and mathematics that can determine factual truth, all other definitions for truth are metaphysical. Truth has been pondered on for thousands by numerous philosophers; it has yet to obtain a definitive resolution. Since your “word,” cannot be proven to be true; your existence as god is nullified as result. You are akin to the fallacies of the past and present; a Santa Clause or Tooth Fairy. Your word is no more true than the Ho, ho, ho of St Nick or found money attributed as a miracle by a pixie like creature.
Because your “word” cannot be proven to be true, what you “say” by word cannot be proven as truth. My bow and its quivers are my own, not to be given to you. The bow of my viola will cease to make music, if relinquished to you. My decorating adeptness would be substandard without my bows. A boat will not float minus a bow. The stand of trees on the edge of my vista will remain. I will be seated in a stand of court to bear witness against you as false. My stand on this issue will not be moved, neither will my deer stand. It stands to reason you are not god and your word has no truth. But also, you claim to be god, but have no command of the English language, its rules of punctuation and capitalization. For those rules are true unlike your word. No omniscience can be attributed to you since truth and you are null.
one who makes water and trees from the spark of a finger tip, easily makes a boat float without a bow.. like i made litle black baby Jesus walk on clouds
Your “darker self” akin to a fallen angel cast into the pit of hell is not god, but sinner. An omnipotent being is devoid of such fault. Are you now a fallen angel? “Before” when?-since it is of an earlier time that I have yet to experience, therefore never to have occurred. By which “stand” in meaning? I have taken mine and have defined. I have no “regret” for negating your purported words and invalidating your claim as god. “Light” is the weight of your words and threats. I have “presence” of mind which you most certainly lack. “Soft” like the kitten’s fur I pet or the down pillow that I rest my head; amenities I can supply myself without forfeit or loss of debate.
“One” is a number of a single item or digit. A digit, also a phalange which second member flies in your direction with vigor. Gases make water and trees rise from seeds. Your incompetence of thought and process is further proof of your fallibility, against a defined all knowing and perfection of an omnipotent being. Your sir, have not a “spark” of decency in claiming yourself as god.
You may sit at the stern of a bowless boat while I will sing the boat’s praises as it makes its way down into Poseidon’ s realm. His wrathful welcome of a false god will be assuredly sweet upon my lips.
click="document.location='/Peepette/photos/album/5789/39432/'" src="../../../photos/albums/1/6/5789/314901-5789-nzfbf-a.jpg" alt="" />
No “baby Jesus” ever walked on clouds, as a child was earth bound as the book tells. Your illiteracy on the one named furthers your lack of omniscient qualities.
i can say things to.. see
well i could believe you.. and i guess i should just believe everything you say
Satan “who brings evil and temptation, and is known as the deceiver who leads humanity astray”  Seen by some as a separate entity, an opposite of god. Or the symbolic yin and yang of contrary forces, a concept that neither good nor evil can exist alone. In the Book, in the story of Job, Satan is shamed by defeat; an omnipotent being cannot be defeated. Satan is also known as the devil, not fear. No one has “fear” of a god and its benevolence. You allude to be the fallen angle, Beelzebub, not a god at all. Others believe Satan resides within man as the evil within, the anti-conscience, again not a god, but man himself.
You words cannot be seen. Does a collection of visual alphabets spew from your mouth upon your utterances? What colors are they? Believe me, you are not an omniscient god. If you were you would have foretold your loss of this debate and curtailed its initiation.
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|