The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Tweka
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

only now is true, as know is only now

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Tweka
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/4/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 435 times Debate No: 67795
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (7)
Votes (2)

 

vi_spex

Pro

i know you are light on my screen and a story in my mind

know=physical experience of now
Tweka

Con

Computer.

A computer is a machine. Therefore, he cannot experience anything outside him.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

i see words on a screen trying to explain its not light i see on my screen

him?
Tweka

Con

Ohh sorry I mistake a tablet for a computer. You are a tablet right????

only now is true, as know is only now

Which means past is not true. I accidentally kills someone. His/Her family sues me. I am not penalized because Past is wrong. Now I did not do anything. Which means I am true. That is purely absurd. In the past you marry someone and he/she runs away during now. wrong.

Which means whatever you know in the past is wrong.

You are a good debater in the past time. It is wrong. You are a son to your parents in the past but now you are no longer their son. This is very funny to me. Once you are their son which means you are forever their son.

Go back to you Pro
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

i am human, the tv dosnt tell me what Is real

truth can only be in the past, and only now is true, and the future is unknown
Tweka

Con

Objective truth is always true regardless of now, future or the past. It is true that radioactive particles are dangerous. So, you are meaning that they are not dangerous in the future. Wrong truth will always be true no matter what happens. Truth is unchangeable.
Debate Round No. 3
vi_spex

Pro

truth can only be in the past, past dosnt matter, now is matter

true is true
Tweka

Con

The TV did tell you what is real. Like there is a robber \y happening in your housing area. It is true because your parents witness it.
Debate Round No. 4
vi_spex

Pro

i have no beliefs

i can at best believe what others tell me, unless they are speaking of something here now, like you are reading these Words, i assume

memories are not something, they are nothing, and matter is something, 0 and 1

the future and past is information, and my imagination only happens now
Tweka

Con

that is your matter. it is not related to this debate at all
Debate Round No. 5
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Tweka 2 years ago
Tweka
ya
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
arguing honestly for what i dont know is true Means i am lying to myself
Posted by Tweka 2 years ago
Tweka
Challenge whatever you think is right.
Posted by Tweka 2 years ago
Tweka
What topic you need to discuss just send them to me
Posted by Tweka 2 years ago
Tweka
What topic you need to discuss just send them to me
Posted by Tweka 2 years ago
Tweka
I don't know.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
what is now without future and past, what is true without false and truth
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
vi_spexTwekaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Tie. Both had proper conduct throughout. S&G - Tie. Both had minor errors in spelling and grammar, nothing that stood out more than the other though. Arguments - Con. Pro failed to provide any substantial evidence that only now is true, nor did I see anything of substance pertaining to know is only now. It was somewhat incomprehensible. Con was able to both troll and counter most of his arguments, whereas Pro continued presenting unsubstantiated claims as evidence for an unclear resolution. For this, Con wins arguments. Sources - Tie. Neither utilized sources in this debate.
Vote Placed by FaustianJustice 2 years ago
FaustianJustice
vi_spexTwekaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con demonstrated the hole in the premise by using time.