only now is true
Debate Rounds (5)
everyday is today, and experience is now
Also, we are technically living in the past, for it takes a little bit for our mind to process images and sounds and whatnot, so would that make our perceptions false?
matter is space, and space is time, and matter is only now
the opposite of matter is information, so information exist beyond space and time, future and past, false and truth
even if there is slight delay i have to imagine it so its irrelevant, i am one is true, and information is separation
only the time of now is true, personal physical experience is matter, like my eyes perceiving physical light
GDNE forfeited this round.
Our experience and consciousness is just a byproduct of matter and time. Time wasn't created specifically for our experience. Time probably wasn't created for any reason, actually. Experience is just a perception of time.
"i am being now, i am now"
You exist now, therefore you are now? Unless you are an all-knowing creator of existence, you can't make a claim like that.
"now, the balancing point between future and past"
Again, we aren't quite sure as to what time is. If time IS a straight line, then every instant of the present is truly the balancing point between future and past, but you can't make a claim like that because we don't know time is! Time could be going all over the place. It could be going forwards, and backwards, and even skipping over itself. It may even have wrinkles or creases. We don't know, though, so you can't make statements like these until we have any evidence supporting in which way time is moving.
"matter is space, and space is time, and matter is only now"
No, that's not true. Matter TAKES space. Space AND time HAVE VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH EACH OTHER AS FAR AS WE KNOW. Lastly, matter HAS EXISTED THIS WHOLE TIME.
"the opposite of matter is information, so information exist beyond space and time, future and past, false and truth"
The opposite of matter is antimatter, not information. Also, why does information get to break the laws of physics? Information is physical, too.
"even if there is slight delay i have to imagine it so its irrelevant, i am one is true, and information is separation"
A slight delay means EVERYTHING. That slight delay makes you live in the past, even if you're only back by a fraction of a second. I don't get the second bit. It makes no sense.
"only the time of now is true, personal physical experience is matter, like my eyes perceiving physical light"
Please actually have support for your "Only Now is True" point, okay? Nothing that you say really relates to that. Also, someone's experience is information, which by your claims would be the opposite of matter, but now you say that information is matter? The light that you see is physical, and your perception of that light is information stored as a thought or memory.
As I've stated earlier, none of your sentences relate to the claim that only now is true. You say that something is something, (i.e. Personal experience is matter, the opposite of matter is information, etc.) but give no support to your claims, nor do you say why these things are relevant. Your arguments are extremely difficult to decipher. They're just riddled with fallacies and missing connections which you don't take the time or care to explain.
I am me=space time being
I am an all knowing creator, the only one that has ever been worshipped
time is matter, as matter is space and space is time, like the invisible thing I breathe
there is no time in the future and past, only the time of now is true
you don't need to know what time is to know you experience it, because you cant experience anything without it
information is antimatter, like negative is anti positive
i don't know any slight delay, the human body is the most advanced existence i know
if you close your eyes you cant read these words, therefore your eyes are real as you have to open them to read on till the end of this sentence, and thus you know that is reasonable to do
GDNE forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.