outdoor games are for a good cause
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Logical-Master
| Started: | 9/2/2008 | Category: | Sports |
| Updated: | 4 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 1,015 times | Debate No: | 5225 |
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (9)
Votes (2)
|
hello contendor this is maithili and the reason for choosing this topic is that nowadays many people are not bothering for the health. so, are you ready to oppose me.
She thinks that because many people are not bothering for the health, that outdoor games are for a good cause. Although I will agree that many people are not in fact bothering for the health, I cannot help but establish that this is an obvious non sequitur fallacy. Furthermore, she must show that all outdoors games are for a good cause in order to win. However, given the cases where individuals may play life threatening games for the purpose of satisfying their own pride, the topic is negated. |
![]() |
|
maithili_dhavala forfeited this round.
COn has failed to contest my argument as well as defend her position, therefore, I win by default. Vote CON. |
![]() |
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by gahbage 4 years ago
| maithili_dhavala | Logical-Master | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 4 years ago
| maithili_dhavala | Logical-Master | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |













Pure genius.
Vote CON.
Nasty.