The Instigator
lintangwisesa
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Dan4reason
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

outlaw negative advertisments during election campaign period

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Dan4reason
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/22/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 448 times Debate No: 49672
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

lintangwisesa

Pro

this is true because negative advertisements will make many effect for the parties and the voter because it will make the voter feel that they are gullible by the parties and they will never trust again with the parties it is mean that the party will decrease they supporter to win in the election and not only that if the negative ads not ban it will make the young generation will imitate they habit to under estimate other party so it's mean that they learn about bullying
Dan4reason

Con

Personally I am tired of all the negative advertisements that dominate campaign season but they are still needed. For every candidate, there is the good and the bad and there is no valid reason why people can't know the bad from advertisements. They can help people know if a politician has been dishonest, voted for things you don't like, or done things you don't like. If all we had were positive advertisements, people would be less informed on some of the bad things your government officials has done. If my representative has done something wrong, I will be favorable toward advertisements that told people this. This helps keep politicians responsible.
Debate Round No. 1
lintangwisesa

Pro

lintangwisesa forfeited this round.
Dan4reason

Con

Extend my arguments to this round.
Debate Round No. 2
lintangwisesa

Pro

lintangwisesa forfeited this round.
Dan4reason

Con

Extend my arguments to this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Actionsspeak 2 years ago
Actionsspeak
lintangwisesaDan4reasonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Relativist 2 years ago
Relativist
lintangwisesaDan4reasonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made tons of mistakes on S & G. Forfeiture warrants loss of conduct.