The Instigator
bobskin
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
ScrinTech
Pro (for)
Winning
11 Points

pasta should be illagal

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
ScrinTech
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/11/2013 Category: Arts
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,092 times Debate No: 42150
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (12)
Votes (4)

 

bobskin

Con

i hate pasta
ScrinTech

Pro

I will accept this debate much to Con's Liking.

1: Why Should Pasta be Illegal?

Con Stated: "I hate pasta"

However only Con dislikes pasta and he hasn't provided any reason he does so.

Benefits of Eating Pasta

1: Pasta is Benefitial to Diabetics
"In a study published by Diabetics Care they had come to a conclusion that grain-based foods with a low glycemic index, such as pasta and oats, are benefitial to Diabetics"[1]

2: Pasta may Reduce the risk of Breast Cancer
According to a study by the Annols of Oncology high glycemic foods may increase the risk while low glycemic foods, seemed to have no influence


3: Low Glycemic Index
Pasta is remarkably low on the glycemic index at around 25-45 depending on the type of pasta

Sources:
[1] http://www.internationalpasta.org...
[2]http://www.livescience.com...

Debate Round No. 1
bobskin

Con

Well I don't just dislike pasta for it's flavor but pasta is the number on reason for cancer of the eye. Also if you drop pasta on your feet you will most likely get warts and then your feet will get infected and they will have to amputate your feet. And then you won't be able to walk.

Resources: Wikipedia.com/pasta and CancerTreatmentCenter/CancerOfTheEye.com
ScrinTech

Pro

ScrinTech forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
bobskin

Con

bobskin forfeited this round.
ScrinTech

Pro

ScrinTech forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
bobskin

Con

bobskin forfeited this round.
ScrinTech

Pro

ScrinTech forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
bobskin

Con

bobskin forfeited this round.
ScrinTech

Pro

ScrinTech forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by ScrinTech 3 years ago
ScrinTech
@Depth_Valor: I mean man cmon: Well I don't just dislike pasta for it's flavor but pasta is the number on reason for cancer of the eye. Also if you drop pasta on your feet you will most likely get warts and then your feet will get infected and they will have to amputate your feet. And then you won't be able to walk.

Resources: Wikipedia.com/pasta and CancerTreatmentCenter/CancerOfTheEye.com
(Think he's just trollin btw(bad at it though))
Posted by ScrinTech 3 years ago
ScrinTech
@Depth_Valor: I knew that but... I just wanted to screw with Con
Posted by Depth_Valor 3 years ago
Depth_Valor
I'm not sure if ScrinTech realizes it but he should be debating for pasta being illegal.
Posted by bobskin 3 years ago
bobskin
Well I don't just dislike pasta for it's flavor but pasta is the number on reason for cancer of the eye. Also if you drop pasta on your feet you will most likely get warts and then your feet will get infected and they will have to amputate your feet.

Resources: Wikipedia.com/pasta and CancerTreatmentCenter/CancerOfTheEye.com
Posted by ScrinTech 3 years ago
ScrinTech
@Comment_Section: Sorry to all for my Terrible spacing on my 3rd point
Posted by APhysicist 3 years ago
APhysicist
@bobskin

What does "illagal" mean?

Also, disliking something does not justify your claim.
Posted by ScrinTech 3 years ago
ScrinTech
@Jacob60rt Thanks for your Input, appreciate it
Posted by Jacob60rt 3 years ago
Jacob60rt
This is an easy win for the Contendor of con's act keeps on going.
Posted by ScrinTech 3 years ago
ScrinTech
Your move m8
Posted by ScrinTech 3 years ago
ScrinTech
@bobskin: This is Legitimately not funny
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by debate339 3 years ago
debate339
bobskinScrinTechTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: ScrinTech had valid argumens while bobskin only had wifes tales
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
bobskinScrinTechTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: Con proved that pasta is totally gross, but pro had better sources.
Vote Placed by InfiniteBears 3 years ago
InfiniteBears
bobskinScrinTechTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Goes to pro for not creating this debate and the title is missed spelled
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
bobskinScrinTechTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Finish what you start.