The Instigator
brony4lyfe
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
carriead20
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

pc is better that console

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
carriead20
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/8/2014 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 499 times Debate No: 62912
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (10)
Votes (2)

 

brony4lyfe

Pro

Pc is much better than console. I rest my case
carriead20

Con

I totally disagree with you consoles are absolutely better than P.C. any day of the week.
Debate Round No. 1
brony4lyfe

Pro

brony4lyfe forfeited this round.
carriead20

Con

Well then I thought that this would be a debate not me explaining my opinion, oh well.

Anyway as the judges may read in the comments someone posted that there aren't any HD games for consoles, this is wrong all the games have HD capabilities. Most people these days have flat screens correct? Good that means all they have to do is plug in an HDMI cord that comes standard with almost all flat screen TVs.

Secondly you can go online and do the same thing as PC's with consoles, you do not need to shell out thousands of dollars to get a computer and all the accessories.
Debate Round No. 2
brony4lyfe

Pro

brony4lyfe forfeited this round.
carriead20

Con

Extend arguments.
Debate Round No. 3
brony4lyfe

Pro

brony4lyfe forfeited this round.
carriead20

Con

Extend Arguments.
Debate Round No. 4
brony4lyfe

Pro

brony4lyfe forfeited this round.
carriead20

Con

Well then. Thank you for your time and may the judges vote fairly and accordingly.
Debate Round No. 5
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by carriead20 2 years ago
carriead20
Actually stickaidan 720p is now considered HD
Posted by stickaidan 2 years ago
stickaidan
HD - means the console RENDERS in hd. 900p is NOT hd - that's about 180 off of HD. The consoles render at terrible res, then scale it up. This is bad. This is like painting a 1X1 square on a deflate balloon, then blowing it up so the square is 10X10. The square might look like it's 10X10, but the quality is still only 1X1.
Posted by carriead20 2 years ago
carriead20
Thank you Dheu for stating your opinion about my round I greatly appreciate it.
Posted by Dheu 2 years ago
Dheu
Secondly this debate doesn't include TV at all, it only includes the CONSOLE, so the console ITSELF doesn't have HD Capabilities.
Posted by Dheu 2 years ago
Dheu
Con states
"Most people these days have flat screens correct? Good that means all they have to do is plug in an HDMI cord that comes standard with almost all flat screen TVs."

Already "assumes" that people have flat screen tvs.

Then states
"Secondly you can go online and do the same thing as PC's with consoles, you do not need to shell out thousands of dollars to get a computer and all the accessories."

The Con has just stated to get HD on a console you will need an HD tv, then states that PC is more expensive than a console. Consider this. An HD TV would cost you about 500-1000 dollars... this not even including the console. Doesn't the console cost more than a PC with this in mind?
Posted by stickaidan 2 years ago
stickaidan
This should be more common sense, not a debate....

PC: HD - games, HD movies, work, social networking, animation, video editing, photo editing, and the capability for mods in almost all games.

Console: some games none in HD, some movies none in HD

Pretty sure this means PC>console.

But.
You know.
Opinions 'n sh!t.
Posted by Dheu 2 years ago
Dheu
This debate is flawed, because it doesn't address if it's talking about only video games or not, because the function of a PC are EXTREMELY greater than Consoles.

Consoles are solely for video game purposes.
PC have many purposes. (games, work, school, communication, etc)

So in this debate, PC are better.
Posted by France08 2 years ago
France08
I agree but it all depends on how much money one is willing to shell out (it all boils down to money), PC can achieve better performance and graphics in exchange for a larger price tag. Consoles were designed for the best fun per dollar ratio. which for casual gamers is better than graphics.

sorry double post, forgot to proofread :( noob here
Posted by France08 2 years ago
France08
I agree but it all depends on how much money (all boils down to money), PC has can achieve better performance and graphics in exchange for larger price tag. Consoles were designed for the best fun per dollar ratio. which for casual gamers is better than graphics.
Posted by LostintheEcho1498 2 years ago
LostintheEcho1498
PC and console both have their own separate advantages. I prefer console for shooters and multiplayer but PC has a much larger (and generally cheaper)market of games. I honestly like them both pretty equally.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
brony4lyfecarriead20Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
brony4lyfecarriead20Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff