The Instigator
fdsaBIG
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Zarroette
Con (against)
Winning
32 Points

people are useless

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 8 votes the winner is...
Zarroette
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/23/2014 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 654 times Debate No: 59439
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (4)
Votes (8)

 

Zarroette

Con

I would like to thank Pro for challenging me personally to this debate.

Since Pro has the burden of proof [1], in that he/she must affirm the resolution, my opponent needed to provide arguments. My opponent has not affirmed his/her side by failing to provide arguments. Therefore, my opponent loses this debate.


References:

http://www.nizkor.org...
Debate Round No. 1
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
@Cooldudebro

The BoP is on the person making the claim. Otherwise, it's a negative proof fallacy.

Besides, how does my opponent have a better argument than me, if neither of us provide arguments? You gave HIM argument points, yet he never made an argument.
Posted by birdlandmemories 2 years ago
birdlandmemories
I think pro proved his stupidity by saying to eat hair in the other debate.
Posted by Cooldudebro 2 years ago
Cooldudebro
I hate the old "the other person has burden of proof" arguments. BOP Shouldn't be involved in a debate.
Posted by Cooldudebro 2 years ago
Cooldudebro
I hate the old "the other person has burden of proof" arguments. BOP Shouldn't be involved in a debate.
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by texans14 2 years ago
texans14
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro provided basically no arguments. Con provided a source. Pro had improper capitalization and had no punctuation.
Vote Placed by Astal3 2 years ago
Astal3
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: What kind of debate is this? There was no argument from either side. Simply saying the BOP is on pro and then not providing any argument yourself is contradictory. Bop is usually shared when it comes to opinionated questions. Pro didn't even provide and argument. since both sides fail to prove anything no points are awarded. If pro accepts cons challenge I hope pro actually has an argument.
Vote Placed by kinsky 2 years ago
kinsky
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: dumbest debate ever...
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con actually argued and provided sources and such.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: dat bop tho
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
dsjpk5
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro offered no arguments, so did not meet bop.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made no arguments.
Vote Placed by Domr 2 years ago
Domr
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct point to Con because there was no argument by Pro???