people arent rationate
Debate Rounds (3)
My opponent has automatically conceded to me. She/He is Con, so she is arguing that people are rationate, but she is stating that they are not. Because she is Con, and is in the wrong side, and has conceded the debate to me, vote for Pro.
My opponent made 4 correct words, not, me, and ok, meant. Because thts, wat, i, pls, debit. These are all not words, and because no one can understand the sentence. Anyways, in the first round Con had conceded, so vote for Pro!
My opponent says that debates are not won by what position you are, by the arguments. This is not true, the positions in a debate matter, because that is what you are arguing. If there are no positions, you don't know if you are supposed to support the resolution, or say it is wrong. Also, because my opponent made arguments for my side, I have nothing much to do, because my opponent made no arguments in his side.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 8 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||1|
Reasons for voting decision: "thts not wat i meant pls debit me ok" is horrendous grammar. S and g to Pro.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.