The Instigator
dkpokusaev
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Dan4reason
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

people should not buy collectible coins

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Dan4reason
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/15/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 970 times Debate No: 49176
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

dkpokusaev

Pro

people should not buy coins for coins and have less coins at the end
Dan4reason

Con

I accept this challenge. I look forward to hearing my opponent's arguments.
Debate Round No. 1
dkpokusaev

Pro

i want your arguments as well so please write that kind of staff in to the comments please
Dan4reason

Con

Sometimes you can't put a price on a good time. For some people, it is very fun to collect coins and to get new ones. It really is a great source of pleasure for some. So who cares if the direct value of 5 new coins is $1.25 and the person selling is asking $20. To the collector, the coins are really worth it. It is just supply and demand.
Debate Round No. 2
dkpokusaev

Pro

buying and selling coins is no good

i understand finding really old coins and collecting them
Dan4reason

Con

My opponent never provided any argument for why it is bad. So refer to my arguments in the last round as a rebuttal.
Debate Round No. 3
dkpokusaev

Pro

dkpokusaev forfeited this round.
Dan4reason

Con

Extend my arguments to this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Relativist 3 years ago
Relativist
dkpokusaevDan4reasonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro provide claims, of which he failed to elaborate. Without any given reason, there is no real contention in Pro's case. Con made a more elaborative contention and his extended arguments wins him points. Forfeiture warrants loss of conduct.