persevering debater please! No quitters
Debate Rounds (3)
"[Any] topic is fine, you can choose"
The topic is:
"There exists a triangle whose internal angles do not add up to 180 degrees"
Triangle - A 2 dimensional three sided shape strictly in Euclidean geometry (i.e. non hyperbolic, non elliptic, non differential etc.)
Over to pro.
 - http://en.wikipedia.org...;
haha, very funny.
My opponent has elected to not make any arguments. I will proceed to demonstrate why a triangle has angles which must sum to 180 degrees.
This demonstrates why the angles sum to 180 degrees
The explanation of why the angles correspond can be found here:
By showing that the same angle is produced on two parallel lines by antoher single line, one can use the idea of vertically opposite angles to show why the diagram shown on the first link is correct.
Over to my opponent to give his counter example.
I totally agree with you. You definitely win the topic of "persevering debater please! No quitters" with your triangle example. Good debate, man. You're really good at debating; you should become a lawyer someday.
There is no basis on which I cannot win this debate. I have perevered and chosen a debate title (my opponent would accept any debate) as my opponent requested. Within that debate, I have also won; my opponent has not demonstrated that a triangle whose angles do not sum to 180 degrees exists. As such, the only fair course of action is to vote con! Furthermore, in round 3 my opponent stated himself that he thinks I should win. Vote con!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by likespeace 4 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Concession.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.