poetry troll debate: trolling trolls is bad because the trolls will troll you and troll more
Debate Rounds (3)
First round acceptance.
Though I have no clue
How the heck I am supposed to argue.
But fine no votes... Only on the polls.
Pro could've spoken to me before but fine.
I'll just leave him with a ":P" smile.
My opponent has asked for this debate to be neglected.
So people please ignore it as I also would have forfeited.
I thought it was a random, interesting topic,
But hey whatever we can do it another day.
Again, please no votes from the readers.
As I just have nothing to do, that is why I am rambling on and typing.
REMEMBER : DO NNOOOTTT VOTE
Or I will be forced to sink all your ships and cannon your boats.
birdlandmemories forfeited this round.
Remember guys: Don't vote please!
If anyone wants to do this topic later on,
leave it in the comments. :)
Silly rhyme that popped into my head:
Monkey break his back
For a piece of pomerac
In his dirty ... sack?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by baus 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||2||3|
Reasons for voting decision: FF, S&G to Pro for the multitude of errors Con made in R2, such as over-capitalization and the misspelling of the word 'not'. Arguments for the actual poem posted in R3 by Con being the only poetic argument of the entire debate. Conduct to Pro for not threatening voters.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.