The Instigator
batman135.6
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TheDebateGuru1738
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

pokemon go shud not be an app

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
TheDebateGuru1738
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/16/2017 Category: Technology
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 393 times Debate No: 99022
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

batman135.6

Pro

NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE. pokemon go should not be an app
TheDebateGuru1738

Con

just saying the word no and saying a sentence doesn't give an idea of why you think that Pokemon go shouldn't be a game.
ill take this free opportunity to start off by saying that it gets the people off their couches.
Pokemon go has made people come out of their houses and wander in the nature while appreciating nature and playing the game.
As of the dangers of the game,the game now gives warnings of where not to go.
it also gives alerts saying not to play while driving and so on
it isn't the game that should be stopped,its the dumb people who misuse the game who should be stopped
Debate Round No. 1
batman135.6

Pro

NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE. pokemon go should not be an app w
TheDebateGuru1738

Con

A debate isn't about saying no over and over it's about actually giving points to stand by your opinion.pokemon go is actually very useful in helping people in going out of their houses.please do provide an appropriate point for me to defend and prove that my side is correct.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by JimShady 11 months ago
JimShady
batman135.6TheDebateGuru1738Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Agreed with Con from the start, and I still do. Pro is very bad at grammar/spelling, and he even messed up in the title of the debate. That being said, Con could work on his, too. Conduct was fine, sources nonexistent, and con actually made a case in that Poke'mon Go! actually gets people active. Pro just says no. And so to him, I say "No."
Vote Placed by Mharman 11 months ago
Mharman
batman135.6TheDebateGuru1738Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: All pro did was say "NO" is short sentences without punctuation, spelling, or grammar. Meanwhile, con backed up his claims, specifically one that strengthened his case was how much more the world got outside.