The Instigator
harrygaryjoe
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
9spaceking
Con (against)
Winning
17 Points

pornography

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
9spaceking
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/5/2014 Category: Arts
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 463 times Debate No: 66411
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

harrygaryjoe

Pro

should you have to be over 18 to watch pornography
9spaceking

Con

No, because all people deserve equal rights.
Debate Round No. 1
harrygaryjoe

Pro

harrygaryjoe forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
harrygaryjoe

Pro

harrygaryjoe forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
harrygaryjoe

Pro

harrygaryjoe forfeited this round.
9spaceking

Con

My concerns in general center on numerous omissions of relevant facts and quotes, which had the effect of diminishing the extent of the apparent support of free expression, and the force of the mroal arguments for free expression, and of enhancing the support of those who are vigilant against dangerous speech, and obscuring the more extreme arguments made on their behalf.
That is why porn should be legalized to people under 18. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 4
harrygaryjoe

Pro

harrygaryjoe forfeited this round.
9spaceking

Con

I win vote me
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by FaustianJustice 1 year ago
FaustianJustice
harrygaryjoe9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: FFed, which is sad, considering how many rounds it was slated for. Might was well bow out early and keep it to a few rounds... but, hey, ats me.
Vote Placed by Jation 1 year ago
Jation
harrygaryjoe9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
harrygaryjoe9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 1 year ago
Blade-of-Truth
harrygaryjoe9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro completely forfeited the entire debate, whereas Con at-least presented some arguments negating the resolution. Clear win for Con.