The Instigator
conservativealive
Pro (for)
Losing
8 Points
The Contender
SANTORUM2012
Con (against)
Winning
14 Points

pretty people are treated better

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
SANTORUM2012
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/26/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 971 times Debate No: 30748
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (6)

 

conservativealive

Pro

Self explanatory
SANTORUM2012

Con

Why was I challenged to this???
This debate makes no since....
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by makhdoom5 4 years ago
makhdoom5
loll
what is this,
Posted by makhdoom5 4 years ago
makhdoom5
loll
what is this,
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 4 years ago
1dustpelt
conservativealiveSANTORUM2012Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had BOP and did not capitalize title
Vote Placed by lit.wakefield 4 years ago
lit.wakefield
conservativealiveSANTORUM2012Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Not giving arguments to either since neither made arguments.
Vote Placed by lannan13 4 years ago
lannan13
conservativealiveSANTORUM2012Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro didn't meet BOP
Vote Placed by TheSaint 4 years ago
TheSaint
conservativealiveSANTORUM2012Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Since pro referenced the resolution in her opening I believe it constitutes as an argument. It had no backing or support but an argument all the same. Con does not even reference the debate meaning no refutation was given, con did not spell words correctly, and since con insulted the debate he accepted that is a loss of a conduct point.
Vote Placed by likespeace 4 years ago
likespeace
conservativealiveSANTORUM2012Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not meet the burden of proof. Con's few words in reply were enough to lose spelling and grammar.
Vote Placed by RyuuKyuzo 4 years ago
RyuuKyuzo
conservativealiveSANTORUM2012Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro didn't make any argument, so she loses for failing to meet her BoP. Con sad "since" instead of "sense", so S/G to Pro.