The Instigator
xxx00
Pro (for)
Losing
6 Points
The Contender
emospongebob527
Con (against)
Winning
19 Points

prisoners should be given a second chance to live their life.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
emospongebob527
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/4/2012 Category: Society
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,094 times Debate No: 27777
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (7)

 

xxx00

Pro

con is required to argue against the notion. first round acceptance only.
emospongebob527

Con

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
xxx00

Pro

xxx00 forfeited this round.
emospongebob527

Con

I await my opponent's arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
xxx00

Pro

xxx00 forfeited this round.
emospongebob527

Con

emospongebob527 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
xxx00

Pro

xxx00 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
xxx00

Pro

xxx00 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by DoctorDeku 4 years ago
DoctorDeku
xxx00emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit
Vote Placed by Firewolfman 4 years ago
Firewolfman
xxx00emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro is a troll, therefore all points go to con. Obvious descion.
Vote Placed by YYW 4 years ago
YYW
xxx00emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: tennis 47 is an idiot. Counter. and PRO failed to meet his BOP. Fail. Conduce to Bob because PRO did nothing meaningful.
Vote Placed by Topiarey 4 years ago
Topiarey
xxx00emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Since Con didn't argue against the resolution that Pro gave, and Pro stated it was Con's job to and that he would not be providing arguments, then Pro, unfortunately, takes the debate.
Vote Placed by RationalMadman 4 years ago
RationalMadman
xxx00emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Such idiocy.
Vote Placed by tennis47 4 years ago
tennis47
xxx00emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: I agreed with pro b4 and after the debate, and con didn't do anything to help his side. Sorry, though.
Vote Placed by Azul145 4 years ago
Azul145
xxx00emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to con because he forfeited less rounds. Spelling to con because of lowercase letters in the first round by pro.