The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
4 Points

proof god is not real

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The Voting Period Ends In
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/14/2016 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 week ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 212 times Debate No: 96142
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)




anything that is created or constructed is a machine, and life is nature, the human body is nature


Pro has named two categories of things that exist: machines and nature. Pro has not proven that god is not machine or nature. Pro has not proven that god does not exist.
Debate Round No. 1


god is a creator, nature is not created, life is nature.. or nature is not a machine


Pro states god is a creator, but has not stated how being a creator prevents god from being nature or machine.

Pro states nature is not created, but has not stated how not being created prevents god from being nature.

Pro states life is nature, but has not stated how life being nature prevents god from being nature.

Pro states nature is not machine, but has not state how nature not being machine prevents god from being machine.

My original point stands. Pro has not proven that god is not real.
Debate Round No. 2


surely god didnt create himself.. cmon now

you can get to arguing now.. my proposition stands as true and undefeated until you demonstrate how you didnt fail miserably

you dont have a point..



Pro argues that god did not create god. That is not proof that god is not real.

Pro has identified nature as real.
Pro has said nature is not created.
Pro has not proven that god is not nature.
If god is nature, then god is not created, so there is no need for god to create god.

Pro has not proven god is not real.

The debate topic is "proof god is not real". Burden of Proof is on Pro to prove that god is not real. I succeed if I show that Pro has not done this. I have shown that Pro has not proven that god is not real. I have not failed.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 week ago
the claims are real
Posted by Quadrunner 1 week ago
I feel like I could destroy Pro in this debate. Con, if you lose, give yourself a nice slap in the face for me. The topic is so loaded in your favor.
Posted by canis 1 week ago
Eliminate what you think a god is..If any thougth of any god has disapered...You got nothing..
Posted by xvyz 1 week ago
Pro may actually be on to something for once
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by skipsaweirdo 1 week ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pros continued with assertions that had no basis in logic or no support for them as being anything but blathering. Pro is a blatherskite whose words and thoughts were nothing more than amphiboly. I think pro misunderstands how to be eristic and that was his motivation not sincere discourse. Cons rebuttals were an excellent example of exhibiting eutaxy. He responded to pros assertions and they were stultified.