The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
DemocraticRepublic
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

purpose

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
DemocraticRepublic
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/6/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 345 times Debate No: 80615
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (11)
Votes (1)

 

vi_spex

Pro


the purpose of all life, is being real for the purpose of life to exist


DemocraticRepublic

Con

I accept this debate even although the question and your argument is very vague but I shall do my best to argue against you as I like a challenge.
I assuming you are arguing about the purpose of life.
The purpose of life simply isn't to "exist" as you put it. Evolution put us on this planet in order to reproduce and breed on the planet to make our species grow. If you look at animals or plants, most of their purpose is to reproduce, for example, the dandelion's most distinct feature is its seeds on it, which is for reproducing. Although, "existing" is a very vague point. We were put here for a much bigger reason rather than to just wander around the planet and "exist". We were here to reproduce in order to grow our species is the primary principle that many scientists believe. Although, religion will say we were put down here through God but we shall not debate that.
The meaning of life or why we are living is a very philosophical topic, but we were simply not here to "exist". There would be no point of us being here if we were simply to "exist", it may sound a scary thought, but we are here for a reason.
Debate Round No. 1
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
there is no your and my logic

truth=known

truth is the opposite of true, matter is true
Posted by Kukithan 1 year ago
Kukithan
First of all, logic is subject. No two people think alike. Second, truth does not equal memory because memory is fallible. Truth often goes unknown because people remember wrong. However, the truth is true whether it is known or not.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
truth=memory
Posted by Kukithan 1 year ago
Kukithan
Neither is truth.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
logic is not subjective
Posted by Kukithan 1 year ago
Kukithan
I think you need to adjust your "logic."
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
moral=logical=knowledge

opposite of belief
Posted by Kukithan 1 year ago
Kukithan
Believing in Jesus does not make one a zombie. Please use your nonsensical arguments to explain. God created free will, therefore he endorses it. We are not zombies; we have morals.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
zombies are not alive
Posted by Kukithan 1 year ago
Kukithan
You are both wrong. The purpose of life is to find Jesus.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Richardsonalj 1 year ago
Richardsonalj
vi_spexDemocraticRepublicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I found DemocraticRepublic's argument more convincing; it was able to explore ideas, which Pro failed to do. Pro was unable to make an actual argument. He failed to bring any support to his claim. Con wins.