The Instigator
evette524
Pro (for)
Losing
10 Points
The Contender
Logical-Master
Con (against)
Winning
46 Points

racial segregation

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/27/2008 Category: Religion
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 7,286 times Debate No: 3408
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (13)

 

evette524

Pro

RAcial segregation is a topic that has impact america all along!
in mY OPinion ALthough many may disagre racial segregation is good
Logical-Master

Con

I negate and will argue how Racial segregation is not good.

Racial segregation can be detrimental for societies both politically and economically.

Racial Segregation also encourages unequal public education.

Due to time constraints, I cannot afford to post any more to my case at the moment. However, this should not be problematic since my opponent has done nothing more than claim that racial segregation was good in round 2.
Debate Round No. 1
evette524

Pro

evette524 forfeited this round.
Logical-Master

Con

Politically: First, segregation is isolation. Isolation from one another encourages individuals to base their views of other races through the media. In other words, stereotypes are going to be encouraged if individuals--regardless of race--don't have the opportunity to socialize with each other regularly.

Economically: Racial segregation is detrimental in the economical aspect as employers will only be able to hire employees of certain ethnicity. In other words, employers won't have the opportunity to hire the best possible workers period. Without having a sufficient option of employees to chose from, businesses will have a hard time functioning.

Education: Not as much money will be devoted to schools containing minority races . Rather, the government will be supplying most of its resources to the majority race, simply due to the fact that it is the majority. The lower the resources, the lower the quality of education.

Hence, I provided 3 objective reasons as to why racial segregation is bad. My opponent has merely stated that it is her opinion that racial segregation is good. Furthermore, she has provided no arguments. Hence, it is painfully obvious that you must vote against her case if you intend to make a ruling here.

I now await the final round.
Debate Round No. 2
evette524

Pro

evette524 forfeited this round.
Logical-Master

Con

Extend all of my points to round 3.

Why to vote CON:

1) My opponent presents no arguments, hence doesn't even attempt to prove her point.

2) My opponent does not address any of my arguments, but forfeits instead.

3) There is no reason to vote PRO.

Thus, vote CON. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
13 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by SPENCERJOYAGE14 3 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
evette524Logical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Vote Placed by Tatarize 8 years ago
Tatarize
evette524Logical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
evette524Logical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Robert_Santurri 8 years ago
Robert_Santurri
evette524Logical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
evette524Logical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Jamcke 9 years ago
Jamcke
evette524Logical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by beem0r 9 years ago
beem0r
evette524Logical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by jiffy 9 years ago
jiffy
evette524Logical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Yraelz 9 years ago
Yraelz
evette524Logical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by SportsGuru 9 years ago
SportsGuru
evette524Logical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03