The Instigator
Citrakayah
Pro (for)
The Contender
Mirza
Con (against)

Redistribution

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Challenge Expired or Declined
Mirza either declined this challenge, or never responded to it. If you are Citrakayah, login to see your options.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/4/2012 Category: Society
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Challenge Declined
Viewed: 777 times Debate No: 26671
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)

 

Citrakayah

Pro

Full resolution: There is sufficient evidence to conclude that redistribution has had a measurable increase in overall welfare.

First round for acceptance only. Usual rules of debate (no semantics, no trolling, et cetera) apply.

I look forward to an enlightening debate.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by asta 3 weeks ago
asta
4/5 Scandinavian economies had their GDP drop by a lot from 2014 to 2016.
Posted by Mirza 5 years ago
Mirza
Change voting period to 1 month, rounds to 3 or 4 (few people read 5 rounds), and change the resolution to: "The US should adapt a redistribution policy akin to the Scandinavian model."
This debate has 10 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.