religion:a way of living gone wrong?
Debate Rounds (3)
Given you did not state your rules, I will assume this round is merely for accepting the debate, and in the following round you and I will provide a more solid opening argument. The subsequent and final round should also be used merely for clash and resolution purposes, considering this is only a 3 round debate.
Also, your opening statement seems to be poorly worded. I am a tad confused about what stance you are taking on this debate, so I justly assumed you took the role that Religion is a bad thing to believe and a bad way to live, which is what I expect to contest.
I am eager to hear your reply, and wish the both of us fun and luck while formulating our key points.
I am sorry if you could not interpret my message..(I only joined yeaterday , this is my second debate and none of my college subjects have even the slightest connection to literature,so i am kinda out of practice:)
Anyways,I am afraid you have interpreted my topic wrong. I never said that religion is a bad thing to believe in or a bad way to live..I have not judged religion.In fact,many religions including kuran,bible etc. promote non voilence, truthfullness,good karma etc. which is definately not bad!
But i think that religion is being WRONGLY used as a weapon to create terror among masses and also bring about racial divide,when in reality no bible,quran or bhagvat gita says any religion is superior to other.Also many people practice religious customs blindly without knowing the true meaning of what they are doing.There is an increased lack of awareness among the masses about religion.
First of all, both examples you provided are fairly invalid. The shooter in Norway was not a christian extremist, in fact he might as well have been an atheist. He shot those people to stop multiculturalism.
And regarding 9/11, it can be justly compared to the Holy Crusades by King Richard. A leader calls for breaking the commandments on which he leads his warriors, (In Richard's case, the bible) and makes them fight for a purpose greater than anything stated in their religious texts.
Now, if you provided me with an example where a God calls for the merciless killing of all people who were not initially part of the religion would be wrong, and I would call that disgusting and an abomination of religion. But that isn't a real world example (Except in a very few tribal groups) and should not be used as a reason to start a debate. In this case, I am not contending that religion should not be used as a weapon, but rather that there are no real example of this happening on a massive scale without some sort of compromise by Men, not God.
neon_cookies forfeited this round.
shift4101 forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 5 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||0|
Reasons for voting decision: No one made convincing arguments, both people forfeited the last round but I'll give the conduct to the instigator since the contender was full of irrelevant insults instead of arguing and presenting evidence.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.