The Instigator
KirstinKate
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
rangersfootballclub
Con (against)
Winning
28 Points

resolved: that the united states fed government should increase alternative energies in the U.S.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
rangersfootballclub
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/11/2009 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 995 times Debate No: 8215
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (10)
Votes (4)

 

KirstinKate

Pro

They should.
rangersfootballclub

Con

is that so ?
Debate Round No. 1
KirstinKate

Pro

haha i posted this argument so it would hide my pevious debate on my profile so yeah I guess if you wanna debate it then I will.
rangersfootballclub

Con

Ok we will .

I think the U.S goverment should not promote nor increase alterative engeries as the goverment is in a finiacil disaster and requires consumers to use energy and petrol and so on so they can tax them , there is no subsistancil profits in using alternative energys and in a time of recssion , the goverment cannot afford to have tens of thousands of oil workers , miners and so on jobless its not ecionically sound.

i await my oppnents response .
Debate Round No. 2
KirstinKate

Pro

thats cool that you think that.
rangersfootballclub

Con

indeed , anything to so to it ? or do i have to post a video of a fat guy ?

fat guy it is.
Debate Round No. 3
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by rangersfootballclub 8 years ago
rangersfootballclub
so who xcares to shoot this horse and hand me a win , i actually posted a debate lol :P well a bit of one plus a video of a fat guy. worth 7 points i would say.
Posted by patsox834 8 years ago
patsox834
When horses are as lame as this debate, they shoot 'em. Just sayin'.
Posted by untitled_entity 8 years ago
untitled_entity
I'm 16, so I don't think the age is 14
Posted by untitled_entity 8 years ago
untitled_entity
0h, well it said it didn't say I didn't meet the criteria so I just assumed... lol
Posted by rangersfootballclub 8 years ago
rangersfootballclub
holy crap your wrong lol.

thats it im turning back time to the sweet old age of 14 so i can takre this debate , even if it means getting spots again im willing to take it , unless of course its not 14 your age anymore ... stop putting cirterias on it ... it cripples the abililty for us to beat you lol.
Posted by untitled_entity 8 years ago
untitled_entity
Holy crap, there's no criteria!!!!
Posted by I-am-a-panda 8 years ago
I-am-a-panda
Have half a brain.
Posted by Danielle 8 years ago
Danielle
Ha. What's the criteria to accept your debate this time?
Posted by Justinisthecrazy 8 years ago
Justinisthecrazy
omg id take that
Posted by I-am-a-panda 8 years ago
I-am-a-panda
Wow, great opening argument PRoO. No-one can top that.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Justinisthecrazy 8 years ago
Justinisthecrazy
KirstinKaterangersfootballclubTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Marine1 8 years ago
Marine1
KirstinKaterangersfootballclubTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by daboss 8 years ago
daboss
KirstinKaterangersfootballclubTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by mrbullfrog11 8 years ago
mrbullfrog11
KirstinKaterangersfootballclubTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07