The Instigator
labarum
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Freegan13333335
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

robotic augmentation vs genetic engineering on humans

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/28/2014 Category: Science
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 844 times Debate No: 44783
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)

 

labarum

Con

pro will be arguing for robotic augmentation
con will be arguing or genetic engineering
Freegan13333335

Pro

With genetic engineering on humans we will be able to live forever and not age and eliminate suffering. This is what the future holds for genetic engineering on humans but robotic augmentation is lame because who wants to be a tin can at the end of the day they would like to feel taste and make love which robotic augmentation will seriously be lacking in.
Debate Round No. 1
labarum

Con

labarum forfeited this round.
Freegan13333335

Pro

Freegan13333335 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
labarum

Con

You dumbass pro is for robotic augmentation
Freegan13333335

Pro

Freegan13333335 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
Interesting resolution... As a voter I hope to see each side both supported and opposed; regardless of the truth that they are not mutually exclusive.
No votes have been placed for this debate.