The Instigator
rvanvactor
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
emospongebob527
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

romney should be president

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
emospongebob527
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/6/2012 Category: Economics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,110 times Debate No: 26958
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

rvanvactor

Pro

Romney should be president because he is better and obama has proven that he is not worthy to be president for another term
emospongebob527

Con

Romney should be president because he is better

How so?

and obama has proven that he is not worthy to be president for another term

Where did you get this flawed assertion?
Debate Round No. 1
rvanvactor

Pro

because abama messed the hell up and he is spending more money than we have in the united states
emospongebob527

Con

Because abama messed the hell up and he is spending more money than we have in the united states



Any figures, sources, evidence, proof?
Debate Round No. 2
rvanvactor

Pro

no i dont have any sourrces other than the radio and the debt has gone up by his i trillion dollar spending bill when he first became president you remember that and his wife bought a thousnd dollars in lonsura
emospongebob527

Con

no i dont have any sourrces other than the radio and the debt has gone up by his i trillion dollar spending bill when he first became president you remember that and his wife bought a thousnd dollars in lonsura


Well sources are needed to prove your points, without these your arguments cannot stand.


Trillion dollar spending bill? Don't know? Sources?
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Grantmac18 4 years ago
Grantmac18
Horrid, rvanvactor created a debate yet refused to present any arguments. Shameful display by the pro"
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by wiploc 4 years ago
wiploc
rvanvactoremospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had the burden of proof, but he never tried to defend his claims.
Vote Placed by RationalMadman 4 years ago
RationalMadman
rvanvactoremospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Terrible debate. Could have been way better.
Vote Placed by RyuuKyuzo 4 years ago
RyuuKyuzo
rvanvactoremospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: While emo's "questions only" method may annoy most, here I think it's acceptable. Pro had the BOP but refused to site sources, or even look into the issue past what the radio told him. Con couldn't debate because there was no prima-facie argument to argue against.