The Instigator
bballbeast7
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
el_ginger
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

same sex marriage

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
el_ginger
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/1/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 404 times Debate No: 53798
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

bballbeast7

Pro

same sex marriage should be allowed because everybody has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness
el_ginger

Con

I accept your debate. Seeing as how you didn't really provide an argument I will allow you to make the first point in round two.
Debate Round No. 1
bballbeast7

Pro

bballbeast7 forfeited this round.
el_ginger

Con

What's a numbers favorite clothing store? Four-fits. (Bad joke)
Debate Round No. 2
bballbeast7

Pro

bballbeast7 forfeited this round.
el_ginger

Con

#winbydefault #notfair #wantedtodebate #hashtags #baller #murica #annoying
Debate Round No. 3
bballbeast7

Pro

bballbeast7 forfeited this round.
el_ginger

Con

turn up for Jesus
Debate Round No. 4
bballbeast7

Pro

bballbeast7 forfeited this round.
el_ginger

Con

This was waste of time. Sorry to anyone who actually cared about this topic.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 2 years ago
bladerunner060
bballbeast7el_gingerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct for the forfeits. Arguments for the fact that Pro never really presented a case of any kind for Con to respond to. I will say, though, to Con that this was a close thing: Pro did present you, at least, with an assertion to support the motion that you could have addressed. You didn't, saying that you were going to wait for Pro to "really provide an argument", but that won't always work. As always, happy to clarify this RFD.