The Instigator
Diptesh
Pro (for)
Losing
7 Points
The Contender
DiablosChaosBroker
Con (against)
Winning
14 Points

saving mother EARTH is better than going before this damn social administration

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/20/2009 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,775 times Debate No: 7481
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (10)
Votes (3)

 

Diptesh

Pro

hi everybody this is diptesh ishwas who is going for the statement today as we are seeing that allaround if we see then we'll notice that everyone is buisy in their own works
if we just simply roam somewhere and go and ask anyone that are they concerned about saving our mother Earth they will simply say life consist of few days live it happily and and according to a survey only only 2 out of 50 are concerned about our mother today we are just only seeing our mother sucked or helping other to suck her more today we are just following that administration which is guided by our society notmore even an animal learns to owe its master ,even an animal gets its mind developed according to certain cindition but do you know why our mind is not developing because we are just like the cattles of a cowboy who kicks badly when the cattle goes to some different location
and we know that we make the society
i think it is getting clearified. so i am just calling this type of administeration a damn adminiterationwhich i want to leave
today the matter is "we are in the middle of an ocean and with a leakage in our ship but inspite of any botherment about it we are enjoying fishing"
and we are unawarethat in what grourd we are standing is getting hollow from inside and it is cracking also side by side.
at last i would say that why our todays youth is not thinging for their mother why why and why.................
DiablosChaosBroker

Con

*INTRODUCTION*
Hello. I'm bored so I'll begin this debate. By the way, your whole round one argument is totally incomprehensible. Perhaps, if you use better English and grammar, we could have a better understanding on what you're saying.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*WHAT YOU NEED TO DO*
You need to define what social administration first.
You need to define mother Earth although I would guess it to be Mother nature.
You need to show how saving the Earth is better than going to whatever social administration you describe.
You also need to give sources/evidence backing up your claims.
You also need to use better grammar in order to make your argument understandable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*OBSERVATIONS*
"according to a survey only only 2 out of 50 are concerned about our mother today"
Where's the survey? Evidence/Sources?

"we are just only seeing our mother sucked or helping other to suck"
Are you taking about the Earth or a mother?

"do you know why our mind is not developing"
What? Our mind is constantly developing as we age and we attain new information from discoveries.

"i think it is getting clearified"
I seriously think it's not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*CONCLUSION*
Enough observations for me. If you use better grammar and make a decent argument, perhaps I would be able to understand your claims better to refute your argument.
Debate Round No. 1
Diptesh

Pro

I was thinking of the same thing which soon happened
actually the thing is that you all (I am not blaming a single particular person) till now is just concerned about this administration
(this time I am going to explain each thing very clearly )
it means that we are going in the same direction which this matrix is showing us
and so all the discoveries and inventions we achieve is just for the benfit of ourselves just to make our luxury more luxorious
i know that for you all its not a matter of fact which should be debated but its just like that ,that when we eat food we just only think for the food not for the plate on which it is their. so similarly we our just concerned about ourselves and just to get behind we name it for the society.
so my question is why, why we do not get feeling for nature why just for ourselves why we are not understanding that if mother nature will no longer exist where we are going to flourish, where?
its like that we our inside of a house which is cracking and we are buisy in ourselves and even not thinking to repair it
but just only inventing some thing for our luxury and increasing the items in our house and not thinking that what will happen if there will be no house.
at last i would say that till now we were confroned against those thing only which are for ourselves as wholly for the society and all the process making us do all these
so guys come out of your dream and leave it because what you are going to confront after some time will be more than a dream..
and i would like to report to all those who didn't understood what its all about and specially DiablosChaosBroker its not your fault that you were not able to get my point but its because you all were till now following the same mantra that is how to make humans life more comfortable.
at last i would add one thing that its not at all boring if you feel it then you are not meant to live on earth

and for my grammer i would say that its because english is not my mother tounge so i do not use it
DiablosChaosBroker

Con

DiablosChaosBroker forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Diptesh

Pro

hey i am back with some other points
in the previous i told you about what we are doing now lets have an eye upon the effects caused just because not proper care and sefishness :-
1:-global warming
2:-greenhouse
3:-ozone layer depletion
and many more the words will over but these effects are increasing like a bamboo plant.
so lets have an eye on what happened and is happening due to global warming

->Over the past 100 years, global mean (average) sea level has been rising at an average rate of 1 to 2 millimeters per year. A possible contributor to sea-level rise is increased meltwater from the snow and ice of glaciers, ice sheets, ice caps, icebergs, and sea ice.
->Glaciers in Alaska and neighboring Canada, with a combined area of approximately 90,000 square kilometers (roughly 35,000 square miles), and accounting for about 13 percent of mountain glaciers on Earth, have thinned substantially. Over the last 40 years, thinning has been on the order of 50 to 100 meters (several hundred feet) at lower elevations of glacier occurrence, and about 18 meters (60 feet) at higher elevations.
->Many glaciers in South America's Andes are melting so fast that, if the current rate continues, they could disappear by 2020. The Quelccava glacier in Peru retreated 32 times faster during the period 1983–2000 than in the 20 years from 1963 to 1983. In the Patagonian ice fields of Argentina, glaciers have receded 1.5 kilometers since 1990.

->In Africa, Mount Kilamanjaro's ice fields have shrunk by a least 80 percent since 1912. Mount Kenya's ice cap has shrunk by 40 percent since the 1960s.
->The 15,000 glaciers of the Himalayas, which collectively constitute the largest body of ice outside the polar caps, are reported to be receding faster than anywhere on Earth. Some 2,000 have melted since the 1950s. Instead of snow accumulation in winter, Himalayan glaciers are being hit by summer monsoon rains. The Dokriani Barnak glacier has receded about 0.8 kilometer since 1990. If Himalayan glaciers recede at this rapid rate, they will be gone by 2035.
->In the European Alps, several glaciers have disappeared entirely since the 1960s.
Permanent sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean is shrinking by an area the size of the Netherlands each year. The Arctic ice cap thinned from 3 meters (10 feet) in 1970 to 2 meters (nearly 7 feet) in 2000.
->In the Antarctic, rising temperatures have resulted in the collapse of massive ice shelves, some of which have been there for 20,000 years.*
->In Glacier National Park in Montana, the number of glaciers has dropped from an estimated 150 in 1850 to only 50 in 2000. At this rate of decline, all of the glaciers in the park will be gone by 2030.
after this i think that you can understand what is going to happen next.
its like ""we are taking milk out from a cow without giving any nourishment""
at last i would ask you pls think ones atleast ones..................
DiablosChaosBroker

Con

DiablosChaosBroker forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Diptesh

Pro

Diptesh forfeited this round.
DiablosChaosBroker

Con

DiablosChaosBroker forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Diptesh

Pro

Pls refer to the above comments and vote as my health is not well so i pnly expect you to vote on the above comments and just with a calm mind read my matter.
Its a request
Plsssssssss.....
DiablosChaosBroker

Con

DiablosChaosBroker forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Diptesh 8 years ago
Diptesh
you all guys are just having a peep to this and going away leave some replies guys.
Posted by Diptesh 8 years ago
Diptesh
yup i want to go against the statement this is really good
Posted by rangersfootballclub 8 years ago
rangersfootballclub
confused.com is where his sources come from i think lol
Posted by DiablosChaosBroker 8 years ago
DiablosChaosBroker
ty. :D
Posted by rougeagent21 8 years ago
rougeagent21
lol nice diablos ;)
Posted by Justinisthecrazy 8 years ago
Justinisthecrazy
Ya, and then what happened?
Posted by JP 8 years ago
JP
haha. what the heck are you saying?
Posted by RoyLatham 8 years ago
RoyLatham
Totally incomprehensible.
Posted by rougeagent21 8 years ago
rougeagent21
You might want to consider putting in some periods...
What are you saying? If you define the resolution more clearly, I night accept. It looks like you are just rambling.
Posted by crackofdawn_Jr 8 years ago
crackofdawn_Jr
What are you saying?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by DiablosChaosBroker 8 years ago
DiablosChaosBroker
DipteshDiablosChaosBrokerTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by rougeagent21 8 years ago
rougeagent21
DipteshDiablosChaosBrokerTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by rofflewoffles 8 years ago
rofflewoffles
DipteshDiablosChaosBrokerTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70