school should start later and end later.
Debate Rounds (1)
Hello, Today there is 1 round of debate. Also there is no forfeiting or you lose.
I believe that School should not start and end later because of 3 main reasons. My first reason is that there is less time to do homework. My second reason is that kids can't grow. My third reason is that we can't go to academies.
My first reason is that there is less time to do homework. For example, if you end in like 7'o clock then you will have about 4 hours of homework.
My second reason is that kid's can't grow. Scientist conclude that if you sleep late you can't grow because growing time is 10- 2.
My third reason is thå† there is no time for academies. Because no one likes going to academies in the morning you usually go to academies in the afternoon to the evening.
In conclusion I think that schools should not start and end later.
Starting school later would prevent lateness which is a very serious issue. It would also allow children fully wake up, and attend school feeling fresh and energized.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by sara_ann_dee 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||2||1|
Reasons for voting decision: Both sides did not have very strong arguments. CON did not use evidence to back up his first or third reason - he only used a source for the second. PRO only posed a counterargument for CON's third reason about academics - he did not address the first or the second. PRO left those arguments unresolved - but he did provide a fact that, since there is only one rounds, cannot be rebutted by CON. Neither side pushed me to believe their claims. They did not present many reasons why their side was the right one to stick with - or why their side was the most beneficial and easy way to time schools. There were many grammatical errors in CON's argument, such as: missing commas and awkward sentence wording. PRO did not make any grammatical errors in his argument. CON was the only side that actually cited a source - therefore, the only fair thing to do it to grant the last section in CON's favor.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.