Science Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 1 - 10

Should genetic engineering be used?

124275
Prepare2Lose

I hate genetic engineering....

Debating Period
3 Comments
Updated 37 Minutes Ago

I've been traumatized.

Max.Wallace
David_Debates

So what....

Debating Period
0 Comments
Updated 15 Hours Ago

fire to the dark ice dragon of krystal mountain.

vi_spex

fire to the dark ice dragon of krystal mountain. to the ultimate dragon slayer, there is no dragon fire to hot, no dragon skin to thick, no wing spand to vast, no claws to sharp, and no fire breathers home to challenging...

Challenge Period
1 Comments
Updated 18 Hours Ago

Relying upon science alone is faulty, as it cannot prove anything.

David_Debates

First, just some ground rules:TOPICALITY:Both sides must stay on subject. If someone strays away from topic, it is grounds for forfeit.STRUCTURE:Round 1: Acceptance only. No arguments in this round.Round 2: Openings. No evidence may be brought forward in this round, just give an overview of where your argument will go. You need not rebut the opposing side's opening either.Round 3: Constructives. Evidence is allowed here. Constructives can be r...

Challenge Period
5 Comments
Updated 1 Day Ago

Human Cloning

will9925452
Haddock

This debate is on all aspects of human cloning. First round is acceptance...

Debating Period
2 Comments
Updated 1 Day Ago

Time travel is possible

Haddock
n7

Time travel is possible, in both forward and backward in time. Technically, people have already gone to the future, as shown in the test where there were two twins, one was sent up in space, the other stayed on earth, and when the older twin came back down, he was now the younger twin. That is the test that proves forward. Backwards is nearly achievable, for scientists are creating a mini-star, which could be collapsed into a mini-black hole, and if you know anything about quantum physics, it is...

Debating Period
1 Comments
Updated 22 Hours Ago

DNA Phenotyping

andrewz61
matthewz17

In June, the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional to take DNA samples from people who have been arrested for serious crimes"without a warrant, much less a conviction. Like bits of DNA taken from people found guilty, those samples can be entered into a database and used not only for the case at hand, but compared to other crime scene samples, connecting the arrestee to past crimes. The case before the Supreme Court focused on Alonzo Jay King, Jr., who was arrested for assault...

Debating Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Hour Ago

intelligence=see

vi_spex
Julian-Harker

past is contrast...

Debating Period
0 Comments
Updated 7 Hours Ago

the judgement of anubis

vi_spex
Kyle_the_Heretic

soda isnt money, holes in my teeth is money.. gods judgement is negative emotional consequence or attachment.. for your heart has been weighed if a feather can not make you pause your tv.. you go to hell the weakness of my power is my need for energy.. for what is my power without energy.. a stone tablet as but a stone.. a low battery.. forfitting the energy i get from my habbit to non existence.. offer to the gods.. pause the tv...

Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

Genetic modification. Should it be legal?

gc_chesterman
mmichaen

Genetic Modification should be legal due to the benefits to the crops increase survivability in various climates. as stated in the article "Genetically Modified Foods: Harmful or Helpful?" By Deborah B. Whitman. Genetically modified crops can be genetically modified to have an increased tolerance to pests, herbicides, cold and droughts. This will lead the crops to be better able to survive in ever changing climates. With climate change looming in the distance and being an ever increasing problem...

Debating Period
0 Comments
Updated 19 Hours Ago