The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
CuriousFear
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

scientific evidence

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
CuriousFear
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/13/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 356 times Debate No: 95376
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

vi_spex

Pro

ban islam
CuriousFear

Con

Islam is not just the second largest religion in the world. It's also the fastest growing religion in the world and it will surpass Christianity around 2050-2100. If you're serious about banning that religion then you need to explain how you will do that.

http://www.pewresearch.org...
https://en.wikipedia.org...
http://www.answering-christianity.com...
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

ow we got an oracle here foks
CuriousFear

Con

You didn't even bring a subjective argument, all you did was call me "an oracle" and you apparently want to ban the belief of almost 1/4th of the human population. Ridiculous.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by DonutQueen 1 year ago
DonutQueen
vi_spexCuriousFearTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: S&G- Pro was unable to use capital letters when due nor did he use punctuation. Armaments went to con because pro did not really provide an argument only a blanket statement to "ban Islam" con did not provide a rebuttal really however he did provide an argument. sources- This went to con because pro did not use any sources at all.
Vote Placed by Kirigaya-Kazuto 1 year ago
Kirigaya-Kazuto
vi_spexCuriousFearTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: S&G to Con: Pro's lack of capitals and punctuation gave Con S&G Arguments: Pro gets arguments this time as con failed to 1) Address Pro's arguments 2) Prove why Islam shouldn't be banned 3) Went from well arguments to addressing Pro directly.