selfies cause cancer
Debate Rounds (2)
^ Selfies and body anxiety
Yes, you heard me. The newest fad of 'selfies' causes cancer, which is Ironic considering that some social media simpletons tried to cure cancer forever and ever recently by posting pictures of them online without any make-up on .
Okay, so admittedly the article at the top only says that selfies increase body anxiety etcetera etcetera, but cancer is by definition the abnormal swelling of skin cells.
Now, where there's anxiety and teenage girls, there's eating to feel better. This causes obesity, which is the extreme swelling of everything of the body, bar brain cells (which do the opposite, interestingly) but including skin cells.
I'm pretty sure I'm the first person to document this type of cancer, so I'll name it GreedyLazyFacebook Cancer. I think it has a nice ring to it.
 http://www.bbc.co.uk...;(Posting pictures to cure cancer)
I'm glad I get to debate a person with their wife as their profile picture, so let's go.
You hurt my feelings with the comments about me being mentally retarded, but I will plough on regardless.
Food can make you feel better , or even worse . If the food makes you feel more happy, you'll have more of it because you want to be more happy like what you experienced before (and this cycle is started because the individual is in need of increased happiness). If the food makes you feel worse, you'll inevitably keep on eating. Either because you're depressed and want to be more depressed, or because you're more depressed and now are in even more need of happiness than before.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Relativist 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||2||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Condenscention(I'm glad I get to debate against a mentally retarded kid so lets go) warrants loss of conduct. S&G was to discourage Condenscention and Pro's argument had (somewhat) at least, a structure that is better than Con. Pro did not establish any sort of causal correlative that selfies cause cancer, and con used this as his argument, therefore he wins. All Pro needed was to prove at an instance, that it does cause cancer. Whatever was argued here in this debate was irrelevant and out of topic. Con explained it so, therefore, he wins even if no arguments were made by Con as Con focused solely on rebuttals.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.