send me a friend request so we can be friends
Debate Rounds (3)
I eagerly await your arguments on why a friend request is necessary. ^_^
CAHAL101 forfeited this round.
And since Pro has not posted any arguments, I will wait for his arguments next round in hopes of rebutting something.
Over to Pro :D
I am quite sure it is possible for members to chat without the friend request. Many members set their message settings to "anyone can PM me"
>yes i may have snapped a little but only because of what she said
That is irrelevant to the debate and you did not clarify who "she" is.
>if you want me to send a request then i will but if you dont want to then its ok
This is also irrelevant to the debate.
/==~=0=VOTING ISSUES=0=~==Arguments: Pro only has one real argument and I rebutted it quite well.
Arguments go to me.
Conduct: Pro FF'd a round.
Conduct goes to me.
S&G: Pro uses improper punctuation and capitalization.
S&G go to me.
Sources: Neither of us have sources.
Therefore I believe I have won today's debate. Thank you and vote Con! ^_^
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ResponsiblyIrresponsible 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments to CON: Pro had the burden of proof and made not a single argument (and never responded to CON's argument that it's possible to be friends *without* a friend request). Conduct to CON because PRO forfeited a round, which is rarely acceptable conduct. As always, happy to clarify this RFD at any time.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.