The Instigator
MIXEDRACERIO
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
LatentDebater
Pro (for)
Winning
23 Points

sex b4 marriage

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
LatentDebater
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/27/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,382 times Debate No: 29612
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

MIXEDRACERIO

Con

personally i do not see the point of sex before mariage and dont bring the bible into it because the bible quotes be fruitful and multiply
LatentDebater

Pro









Sex before marriage is wrong? Would you buy a car without test driving it?


Debate Round No. 1
MIXEDRACERIO

Con

pin point the facts that is so wrong about it ?

and to your abouve question i would buy a car without test driving it. i would take the dealers word for it
LatentDebater

Pro

There is nothing wrong with it, you are the one who has to "pin point the facts that is[sic] so wrong about it."

In that case you could very easily end up with a faulty car whilst someone takes the car that, if you had test driven, you would have taken to be your own and cared for far better than them and your car would have pleased you far better than the one you have.
Debate Round No. 2
MIXEDRACERIO

Con

you replied sex before mariage is wrong so dont you need to say why its wrong..
im against the idea of sex before marriage i believe when your ready have it

and to your question about the car sometimes you have to take a gamble in life buying a dodgy car is not the end of the world
LatentDebater

Pro

I never, ever in this debate said that sex before marriage is wrong because this is not my side of the debate.

You have failed to refute my point that using the analogy (which you blatantly decided to accept as your only contention of 'gambling') "you could very easily end up with a faulty car whilst someone takes the car that, if you had test driven, you would have taken to be your own and cared for far better than them and your car would have pleased you far better than the one you have."

I have met my burden of proof while you refuted nor addressed anything I said. I think it's rather rude of you to ask me to give reasons for YOUR side of the debate. Although your lack of understanding basic debate etiquette does amuse me, and I'm a very difficult person to amuse.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by DebaterAgent 4 years ago
DebaterAgent
MIXEDRACERIOLatentDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con seemed weak with his arguments and pro did a lot better with the arguments too.
Vote Placed by Jarhyn 4 years ago
Jarhyn
MIXEDRACERIOLatentDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro argued what was ostensibly his side, and CON either did not know, did not spell out, or did not care what his side was to be. The part about "test driving" was particularly interesting.
Vote Placed by Deadlykris 4 years ago
Deadlykris
MIXEDRACERIOLatentDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I couldn't figure out what Con was actually saying, or if he was even arguing the proper side.
Vote Placed by likespeace 4 years ago
likespeace
MIXEDRACERIOLatentDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: MIXEDRACERIO did not prove sex before marriage was wrong, and LatentDebater gave a good argument in favor. Arguments and S&G (obvious) to Pro.
Vote Placed by superkamal26 4 years ago
superkamal26
MIXEDRACERIOLatentDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro debated very well. He won this debate by a lot.